Search Results for "Composite Agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Composite Agreement"

545 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 545 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to CERC's Authority Over Inter-State Open Access Conditions; SLDC's Clause Deemed Contrary to UI Regulations. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission's Order on Unscheduled Interchange Charges Found to Prevail Over SLDC's Imposed Conditions Under Electricity Act, 2003.

30 Apr 2026

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice and Assessment Order Found to be Based on Different Grounds, Causing Prejudice to Assessee.

17 Oct 2025

The Petitioner, West India Continental Oils Fats Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 2013, filed a writ petition under Article 22...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

6 Dec 2024

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Swisskem Healthcare & Anr. — 'PANDERM' and 'POLYDERM+' Held Deceptively Similar. The Court held that the marks are structurally and phonetically similar, and the Defendant's use is likely to cause confusion, especially in medicinal products where a high degree of care is expected.

2 Jul 2019

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, Swisskem Healthcare and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Intervention Application in Section 34 Arbitration Proceedings. Third Party Cannot Intervene in Section 34 Application Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as It Is a Summary Proceeding Between Award Debtor and Award Holder Only.

10 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Luxury Lifeline, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18/12/2017 passed by the Principal District Judge, Nagpur, rejecting...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Electricity Board Against MSEFC Awards Due to Limitation — Limitation Period Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Applies to MSMED Act Awards. Delay of 120 days cannot be condoned as per Section 34(3) proviso, and no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in filing the applications to set aside the awards.

27 Aug 2018

The case involves nine commercial appeals filed by various micro and small enterprises (appellants) against the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Builder/Promoter in Summary Suit for Recovery of Maintenance Charges Under MOFA Agreement. Defendant's Failure to File Reply to Summons for Judgment Leads to Decree for Claimed Amount with Interest.

22 Jul 2011

The plaintiff, Sai Om Petro Specialities Ltd., a builder/promoter, filed a summary suit against the defendant, M Industries, for recovery of alleged m...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Sections 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Reopening Based on Change of Opinion on Rule 8 Loss Set-Off Held Invalid. The court held that Rule 8 of Income Tax Rules, 1962 applies to both income and loss, and loss from plantation division is a business loss allowable under Rule 8.

1 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Hindustan Unilever Limited, filed its return of income for assessment year 2004-2005 on 29 October 2004, showing net profit before tax...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Income Proof. Claimant's 100% Permanent Disability Acknowledged but Multiplier and Income Assessment Modified Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

16 Feb 2010

The National Insurance Company Ltd. appealed against the judgment and order dated 7.6.2004 of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Pune, in Claim Peti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision that Photocopying is Not a Works Contract Under Maharashtra Sales Tax on Works Contract Act. Activity of taking xerox copies does not involve transfer of property in goods, and the person carrying out such activity is not a 'dealer' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Maharashtra Sales Tax on Transfer of Property in Goods involved in Execution of Works Contract (Re-enacted) Act, 1989.

3 Mar 2006

The case involves a Sales Tax Reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharash...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)