Search Results for "Chief Settlement Commissioner jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Chief Settlement Commissioner jurisdiction"

370 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 370 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Jurisdiction and Interest Award Under MSMED Act. Court held that remedy under Section 18 of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 is optional, not exclusive, and ad hoc arbitration permissible, with interest under Section 16 MSMED Act upheld.

10 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a contract for supply of VRLA batteries between Petitioner, a government enterprise, and Respondent, a company registered under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Lays Down Pan-India Guidelines Against Demolition of Properties of Accused Without Due Process. Executive Cannot Use Demolition as Punishment for Crime; Right to Shelter Protected Under Article 21.

1 Oct 2024

This batch of writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raised a grievance that residential and commercial properties of persons ac...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Order in Favor of Wakf Board — Land Belonging to Wakf Cannot Be Claimed by Private Individuals Based on Revenue Entries Alone. Petitioners failed to establish title over wakf land, and the court held that mutation entries do not confer title, directing them to approach the Wakf Tribunal under Section 85 of the Wakf Act, 1995.

20 Dec 2023

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, K...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses and Handwriting Expert, and Suit Property Not Identified.

13 Sep 2023

The appellant, M/s. Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC against the judgment and decree dated 30.04.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale of Mortgaged Property Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 — No Ground to Set Aside Sale After Certificate Issued and No Appeal Filed.

27 Feb 2023

The petitioners, Si2 Microsystems Pvt. Ltd. and its director Sanjay Vedaprakash Soni, availed a cash credit facility of Rs. 10 crores and a term loan ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Expunging of Expert Evidence Applying Foreign Law in Suit for Enforcement of Foreign Judgment. Expert Witness Cannot Apply Foreign Law to Facts; Only State the Law Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC and Section 45 Evidence Act.

29 Aug 2017

The plaintiffs filed a Notice of Motion seeking to expunge parts of the affidavit of evidence of the defendants' expert witness, Mr. Patrick Keel, who...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in NI Act Case Due to Non-Prosecution. Complainant Bank's Failure to File Evidence Affidavit Despite Presence Justified Acquittal Under Section 256 CrPC.

8 Feb 2016

The appellant, The TJSB Sahakari Bank Ltd., was the original complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 agai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act, 2006 as Constitutionally Valid. Levy of fire prevention fee under Section 12 is a fee, not a tax, and the Act is within legislative competence.

5 Dec 2015

The petitioners, Vidarbha Taxpayers Association and a citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of the Mahar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Village Panchayat Member for Being Servant of Agricultural Produce Market Committee. Agricultural Produce Market Committee Held to be a Local Authority Under Section 14(1)(i) of Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958, and Section 3(31) of General Clauses Act, 1897.

22 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Babasaheb Devram Sathe, was elected as a member of the Gram Panchayat, Jalgaon Budruk, in 2010 and also functioned as Sarpanch. The fi...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)