WRIT PETITION NO. 5634 OF 2014
30 Oct 2015Three writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a group of workers, including Aayas and Ward Boys, challenging the c...
Search Results for "Central Government employee"
2140 result(s) found
Found 2140 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Rules on Maintainability of Unfair Labour Practice Complaint under MRTU & PULP Act. Direct Employer-Employee Relationship Must Be Established Before Industrial Court Can Assume Jurisdiction.
26 Jul 2006Mahindra & Mahindra Limited filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of the Industrial Court which had dismissed its a...
- 16
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Wife’s Challenge to 50% Family Pension Order; Upholds Equal Shares for Both Widows Under Rule 75(7)(i)(a) of Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993. Second Wife’s Claim Recognized Despite Void Marriage Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Based on Service Rule Mandating Equal Distribution Among Multiple Widows.
20 Dec 2023The dispute pertained to the entitlement of family pension following the death of a railway employee who had married twice. The employee, R. Ramesh Ba...
- 39
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Employer's Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement Under Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme (MVRS). Resignation Submitted Under MVRS Was Unconditional and Could Not Be Withdrawn After Acceptance, as Per Scheme Terms Under Clause 5.1.
27 Sep 2021The dispute arose from the respondent's resignation under the Modified Voluntary Retirement Scheme (MVRS) introduced by the appellants, a public secto...
- 225
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging School Tribunal Order in Service Dispute Under Article 227 of Constitution of India — Appointment of Teacher Without Prior Approval from Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities Held Invalid. The court set aside the School Tribunal's order directing reinstatement of a teacher whose appointment was made without mandatory approval under Section 33 of Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
30 Jun 2026The petitioners, Pratik Seva Mandal and Late Sau Jamanaben Vithalbhai Shapariya Karnabadhir Vidyalaya va Vastigruha, filed a writ petition under Artic...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Employees for Illegal Strike and Misconduct Without Enquiry — Justified Under MRTU & PULP Act. Employer's Right to Lead Evidence Before Labour Court to Justify Dismissal Without Enquiry Upheld When Atmosphere of Terror Prevents Disciplinary Proceedings.
22 Oct 2024The case involves a writ petition filed by 22 ex-employees of M/s. Advani Oerlikon Ltd. challenging the judgment and order of the First Labour Court, ...
- 703
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Industrial Dispute Reference Due to Procedural Irregularity in Conciliation Initiation Under Industrial Disputes Act
27 Jan 2026The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal filed by Appellants challenging the reference of industrial dispute to Industrial Court, Aurangabad -- The ...
- 922
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Anganwadi Sevika with Full Back Wages in Termination Dispute. Industrial Court's Revision Order Restoring Continuity and Back Wages Upheld as Termination Found Unjustified Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
25 Sep 2014The petitioners, the Zilla Parishad and the Child Development Project Officer, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court dated 17/09/2013 in Rev...
- 238
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer Directed to Reinstate Employee with Back Wages. Abandonment of Service Claim Rejected as Employee Reported for Duty After Maternity Leave.
26 Apr 2006The present petition was filed by Finlay Mills challenging an order dated 4.12.2002 passed by the Industrial Court, Bombay in Complaint (ULP) No.169 o...
- 81
High Court
High Court of Bombay Directs Re-adjudication of 21 Employees' Claims; Dispute on Interest and Bonus Under Winding-Up Not Resolved in Extracted Judgment Text. The court granted partial relief by allowing prayer (b) for re-adjudication of claims of 21 workmen due to discrepancies, while the final decision on prayer (a) concerning statutory interest, bonus, and provident fund contribution under the Companies Act, 1956 is not discernible from the incomplete text.
4 Aug 2006The case concerns a company application filed by the Engineering Workers Association, representing 121 employees of M/s. Poysha Industrial Co. Ltd., w...
- 27
