Search Results for "Bombay Stamp Act 1958"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Bombay Stamp Act 1958"

319 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 319 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

30 Nov -0001

The present second appeal arises out of a civil suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction filed by the original plaintiffs (now appel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Against Housing Society and Flat Owners for Lack of Arbitrable Dispute. Dispute over alleged oral agreement for redevelopment of building not covered by arbitration clause in share certificate.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, M/s Heritage Lifestyle & Developers Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Arbitration Petition and Winding Up Petition Against Corporate Debtor — No Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief or Insolvency as CDR Scheme Was Under Consideration and Debt Was Not Clearly Due.

6 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd., a non-banking financial company, granted a term loan of Rs. 50 crores to the first respondent, U...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Kunbi Caste Certificate for Sarpanch Election. Committee Failed to Consider Relevant Documents and Applied Incorrect Burden of Proof Under Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000.

27 Oct 2020

The petitioner, Mrs. Mandakani Kachru Kokane, was elected as Sarpanch of Ghoti (K) Grampanchayat on 26 June 2019 for a term 2019-2024, a post reserved...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition; Sets Aside Order of Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Rejecting Condonation of Delay Under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act. Compensation for Land Acquisition Exempt under RFCTLARR Act Not Considered by Revenue; Matter Remanded for Fresh Decision.

8 Aug 2024

The petitioner, the widow of the deceased assessee, sought condonation of delay in filing the income tax return for the assessment year 2022-23. Her h...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Award Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Consideration of Evidence. The court held that denial of cross-examination and failure to consider electronic evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act, 1872, renders an arbitral award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

29 Apr 2016

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Review Order in Suit for Specific Performance — Review Granted Without Notice to Plaintiffs Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The trial court's order allowing review under Order 47 Rule 4 CPC without notice to the opposite party is illegal and set aside, restoring the original decree.

8 Feb 2005

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for specific performance of contract against the respondents, original defendants. The trial court d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Banking Investment Dispute - Failure of Respondent to Nominate Arbitrator Triggers Court's Power Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising out of an Agreement dated 18th April, 2018 and Deed of Guarantee dated 18th April, 2018, as the respondent failed to nominate an arbitrator.

17 Jul 2023

The applicant, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., a public company and banking company, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Concili...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.

19 Nov 2025

Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)