KAHC010159832015_1
15 Dec 2017...
Search Results for "Bombay Civil Service Rules"
5212 result(s) found
Found 5212 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.
21 Oct 2011The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Satara, which c...
- 134
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Waqf Tribunal's Interim Order in Property Dispute. The Revision Application Raised Jurisdictional Question Regarding the Competence of a Single-Member Tribunal After the 2013 Amendment to the Waqf Act, Without a Transitory Provision.
11 Sep 2015The case arose from a civil revision under Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act, 1995, filed by the original defendants (Magnum Developers and others) challe...
High Court
Karnataka High Court Division Bench Pronounces Judgment on Constitutional Validity of Karnataka Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2023 and Karnataka High Court (Amendment) Act, 2023. The Verdict on the Appeal and Connected Petition Remains Unstated in the Available Excerpt of the Judgment.
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha, heard a writ appeal a...
- 91
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Borrowers' Right to Hearing in RBI Fraud Classification Directions. The Court held that principles of natural justice, specifically audi alteram partem, must be read into the Reserve Bank of India (Frauds Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and Select FIs) Directions 2016 to prevent arbitrariness, as classification entails serious civil consequences under Clauses 8.9.4 and 8.9.5.
27 Mar 2023The civil appeals arose from challenges to the Reserve Bank of India (Frauds Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and Select FIs) Directio...
- 323
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Decree for Specific Performance. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.
1 Jul 2014The appellant, Mrs. Kiran Nashine, filed two appeals against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2009 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division...
- 46
Supreme Court
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026
1 Jan 1970The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal by Stranger Purchasers Against Decree of Specific Performance — Upholds Rejection of Condonation of 1869 Days Delay. The Court held that a stranger purchaser claiming through a defendant cannot seek condonation of inordinate delay without showing sufficient cause, and the lower appellate court's refusal to condone delay was not erroneous.
21 Feb 2020The case arises from a second appeal filed by Narayansingh s/o Omkarsingh Baghel and Roshan son of Narayansingh Baghel (appellants) against an order d...
- 51
High Court
Gujarat High Court Dismisses Revision Against Possession Warrant Under Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 — Licensee's Alternative Accommodation Irrelevant. Court holds that summary remedy under Section 41 is available to licensor upon revocation of license, and pendency of civil suit or licensee's other property does not affect the right to possession.
21 Jan 2026The case involves a revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by Pradipkumar Gordhandas Patel (revisionist) a...
- 96
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeals and Dismisses Assessees' Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Case — Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of CGST Act. Court holds that denial of ITC on construction of immovable property used for renting is valid and does not violate Articles 14, 19(1)(g), or 300A.
3 Oct 2024The case involves a challenge to the constitutional validity of clauses (c) and (d) of sub-section (5) of Section 17 of the Central Goods and Services...
- 1350
