Search Results for "Article 300-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Article 300-A"

362 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 362 result(s)

Supreme Court

Public Interest Prevails Over Private Rights: : BIADA vs M/s Scope Sales Pvt Ltd (2026 INSC 89)

23 Jan 2026

The case arose when the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (BIADA) allotted land to M/s Scope Sales Pvt. Ltd. for commercial use. Subsequentl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Provisional Attachment Order Under PMLA — Upholds Validity of Section 5(1) Attachment Without Prior Show Cause Notice. Court holds that provisional attachment under Section 5(1) of PMLA is an interim measure and does not require prior hearing, as the Act provides for post-decisional hearing under Section 8.

24 Nov 2025

The petitioners, Mr. Naresh T. Jain and two companies, challenged a provisional attachment order dated 30th September 2021 passed by the Director of E...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Slum Notification for Non-Compliance with Section 3 of Karnataka Slum Areas Act. Landowners succeed in challenging slum declaration due to lack of prior publication and consideration of objections.

19 Sep 2025

The petitioners, owners of land in Mandya District, challenged a notification dated 07.01.2013 issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Mandya, declaring th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Owners in TDR Dispute — Upholds Godrej & Boyce I and Holds 2016 Amendment Prospective. The Court ruled that the right to 100% TDR for constructing amenities vests upon surrender and development, and the 2016 amendment to Regulation 34 of DCR, 1991 cannot operate retrospectively to defeat that right.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from three judgments of the Bombay High Court concerning the entitlement of owners/l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Despite Delay in Filing Application Under Section 48(1) of Maharashtra Stamp Act. Limitation Bars Remedy Not Right, State Cannot Retain Double Stamp Duty on Same Transaction.

27 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Nanji Dana Patel, entered into a development agreement with Keshav Krishanlal Syngal on 3 March 2014, paying stamp duty of Rs.78,65,00...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry Based on Unregistered Will — Revenue Authorities Directed to Delete Entry and Restore Original Names. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Revenue Authorities Must Follow Procedure Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

12 Oct 2023

The petitioners, thirteen residents of Ghatshendra, Kannad, filed a writ petition challenging the mutation of their names in the revenue records in re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Non-Development of Land Reserved for Garden in Development Plan. Held that reservation for garden does not automatically lapse upon non-development within 10 years; however, failure to acquire land within reasonable time renders reservation invalid and owner entitled to compensation or release.

10 Oct 2023

The petitioners, Runwal Township Pvt. Ltd. and its director Kishorkumar Jain, owned land in Mumbai that was reserved for a garden in the Development P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Landowners in MRTP Act Reservation Lapse Case; Reservation Deemed Lapsed as Corporation Failed to Acquire Within Six Months of Purchase Notice. Petitioners Argue That Automatic Lapsing Under Section 127 Is Irreversible and Subsequent Notification Void.

16 Sep 2022

The petitioners, owners of a parcel of land bearing CTS Nos. F/189, F/190, F/191, F/192 and Final Plot No. 646, T.P.S. No. III, Bandra, Mumbai, filed ...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 73 OF 2015

3 May 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

9 Oct 2015

The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)