Search Results for "Ancillary powers"

793 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 793 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tax Liability on Sale of Discarded Materials by BEST Undertaking Under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Court holds that sale of scrap from non-dealer activity is taxable under section 22(5A) and that appeal under section 55(6)(c) is maintainable only on questions of law.

The case involves two references under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a common order of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Suit for License Fee and Compensation, Allows Defendant's Counter-Claim for Losses Due to Suppression of No Development Zone Status. Plaintiffs held liable for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding land use, entitling Defendant to damages for demolished tower.

The plaintiffs, owners of a larger property in Madh, Malad, Mumbai, entered into a leave and license agreement with the defendant, a telecom company, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Builder's Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Partly Quashing Stop Construction Notice and Directing Objections Under KIAD Act. The Full Bench Reserves Judgment on 06-02-2014, but the Final Decision is Not Available in the Provided Incomplete Text.

The case involves writ appeals filed by M/s Century Central, a registered partnership firm, challenging the order dated 02/07/2013 passed by a learned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Refusal to Stay Redemption Fine. Holds that Customs Tribunal Has Inherent Jurisdiction to Stay Redemption Fine Under Section 125 of Customs Act, 1962, as Section 129E Does Not Apply.

The appellant, Mydream Properties Private Limited, imported a yacht and VSAT equipment, against which the Commissioner of Customs passed an order-in-o...