Search Results for "vexatious request"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "vexatious request"

286 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 286 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Sanction Order Under Section 197 CrPC – Petitioner Alleges Improper Review of Earlier Refusal. Alleged Lack of Fresh Material and Improper Reconsideration of Evidence Previously Rejected.

22 Dec 2017

The petitioner, a public servant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 4th February 2016 p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

28 Jul 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Summary Suit Under Order XXXVII CPC Due to Absence of Triable Issues. Leave to Defend Rightly Denied as Invoices Constituted Written Contracts Establishing Appellant's Liability for Goods Supplied.

18 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a summary suit for money recovery filed under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the plaintiff-respondent No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Assessment Orders Under BST Act — Holds That Tribunal's Order Dated 20/01/2015 Has Prospective Effect Only. The assessing authority acted without jurisdiction in passing assessment orders for 2013-14 contrary to the directions of this Court in Writ Petition No. 2217 of 2015.

18 Apr 2019

The petitioners, Reliance Industries Ltd. and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Vitiated Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 found to be without application of mind, and prosecution evidence on demand and acceptance of bribe was mutually inconsistent.

29 May 2019

The appellant, Ravindra s/o Marotrao Thakre, was convicted by the Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for offences under Sectio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Petition Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Disputes arose from Construction Management Agreements regarding completion notices and fee obligations, with the court determining arbitration under those agreements was appropriate.

22 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India dealt with two arbitration petitions filed by DLF Home Developers Limited (DHDL) under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Extensions in Commercial Premises. Petitioners Failed to Show Any Sanctioned Plan or Permission for Structures on Compulsory Open Space Under Section 55 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

2 May 2011

The petitioners, occupants and owners of shops in Dattani Shopping Centre, Mumbai, challenged an order dated 14 January 2011 passed by the Assistant M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Victim Compensation Appeals Under Section 357A CrPC — State Must Compensate Victims Even if Accused Acquitted or Untraced. The court held that victim compensation is a mandatory duty of the State, not dependent on conviction of the accused.

27 Apr 2012

The judgment concerns four criminal appeals (Criminal Appeal Nos. 991, 992, 331, and 854 of 2011) heard together by the Bombay High Court. The appeals...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Cross-Examine Autopsy Surgeon on Treatment Papers in Murder Trial — Section 294 CrPC Does Not Bar Cross-Examination on Documents Not Formally Proved. The court held that the right of cross-examination is a valuable right and cannot be curtailed by a narrow interpretation of Section 294 CrPC, and the accused must be allowed to challenge the doctor's opinion on the basis of treatment papers produced by him.

13 Jan 2020

The petitioners, original accused in Sessions Case No. 153 of 2015 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, are charged under Section...

High Court

High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing Re-Trial Under Section 216(4) Cr.P.C. in Murder Case Transferred to CBI. The Court Holds that Section 216(4) Cr.P.C. Does Not Empower Trial Court to Efface Evidence or Order De Novo Trial; Only Alteration of Charge and Examination of Witnesses for Altered Charge Permitted.

31 Aug 2024

The matter arose from a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, challenging an...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)