Search Results for "trademark"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "trademark"

243 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 243 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Petitioner in Trade Mark Rectification Case Due to Prior Rights and Dishonest Adoption. Impugned 'C21' Registrations Cancelled as Respondent Incorporated 'CENTURY 21' into Corporate Name and Registered Identical Marks Without Explanation, Violating Sections 11, 47, 57 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a multinational franchising company, the Petitioner, engaged in real estate business under the marks 'CENTURY 21' and 'C21', chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Defendant Guilty of Contempt for Willful Disobedience of Injunction in Copyright and Passing Off Case. Defendant's Continued Use of Deceptively Similar Trade Dress Despite Court Order Constitutes Contempt Under Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC.

16 May 2019

The Plaintiff, Cargil India Private Limited, a subsidiary of Cargil Inc., is engaged in the business of edible oils and holds copyright in the packagi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case — Defendant's Logo Held Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Logo. Well-known mark entitled to protection across classes under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

30 Jun 2016

The Plaintiff, Reliance Industries Ltd., filed a suit seeking injunctive reliefs against the Defendant, Concord Enviro Systems Pvt. Ltd., alleging inf...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Trial Court Order in NI Act Case — Objections to Marking of Documents Must Be Decided Then and There. Trial Court's Deferral of Objections to Final Stage Held Contrary to Law Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

30 Jan 2015

The applicants, M/s. Nexus Minmet Merchandising Private Limited and its directors, were facing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Company for Failure to Repay Convertible Bonds — Debt Admitted and Company Unable to Pay Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that where a debt is admitted and the company is commercially insolvent, a winding up order is justified.

30 Jul 2013

The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as trustee for bondholders, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 ag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition Against Order in Trademark Dispute Due to Lack of Jurisdiction of Single Judge. The original writ petition challenging IPAB order under Trade Marks Act, 1999 was heard by a Single Judge, but as per Rule 636 of Bombay High Court Original Side Rules, 1980, such matters must be heard by a Division Bench, rendering the order without jurisdiction.

29 Oct 2012

The petitioners, original respondent nos.2 and 3, filed a Review Petition against an order dated 29th April 2011 passed by a Single Judge in Writ Peti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Predeposit Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute. CESTAT's direction to deposit Rs. 1 crore set aside as assessee had strong prima facie case on valuation under Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

21 Mar 2012

The appellant, Jabil Circuit India Private Limited, is a manufacturer of set-top boxes. It sold these boxes to Thomson Holdings India Private Limited ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Passing Off Action — Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Khandelwal Laboratories Ltd. — Trade Mark CEFO v. CEFI. The court found that the marks CEFO and CEFI are deceptively similar, especially in the pharmaceutical context, and granted temporary injunction under Section 27 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

27 Sep 2005

The plaintiff, Medley Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for passing off against Khandelwal Laboratories Ltd. seeking interim injunction to restrain t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Non-Compliance with Section 69 of Indian Partnership Act and Bar of Res Judicata. Suit by unregistered partnership firm held not maintainable; subsequent suit for same cause of action without withdrawing earlier suit also barred.

6 May 2005

The plaintiff, Jayesh Pandya, a real estate broker, conducted business under the name 'Pandya & Shah Associates', which was an unregistered partnershi...

Tribunals

NCLAT Chennai Allows Appeals by Resolution Professional Against Rejection of Fee Claims Under IBC. Held that the Adjudicating Authority cannot reduce or disallow fees fixed by the Committee of Creditors without valid reasons.

30 Nov -0001

The present appeals were filed by Mr. Immaneni Eswara Rao, a Resolution Professional, against four separate orders passed by the National Company Law ...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)