Search Results for "section 66(1)"

348 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 348 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Criminal Defamation Laws. The Petitioners Contend that Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 CrPC Violate Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, with Subramanian Swamy as the lead petitioner, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction and Fine of Rs.1.80 Crore Upheld. Dishonour of Cheque for Rs.90 Lakhs Issued Towards Repayment of Loan — Presumption Under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Not Rebutted by Accused.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused (Maxworth Realty India Ltd. and its Chairman & Managing Director K. Kesava) challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Enhances Compensation to Rs.1,80,000 per Hectare. Market value determined based on previous judgment in related appeals.

The appellant, Hari Narayan Dhande, was the owner of Survey No.2/3, area 4.04 HR, situated at village Bhoyar, Tq. Dist. Yavatmal. The Maharashtra Indu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Life Imprisonment of BSF Constable for Murder, Rejects Plea of Private Defence. Evidence of Post-Mortem and Eyewitnesses Showed Deceased Was Made to Crouch and Shot Twice, Negating Claim of Self-Defence Under Section 46 of BSF Act, 1968 and Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, a Constable in the Border Security Force (BSF), was convicted under Section 46 of the BSF Act, 1968 for murder punishable under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal. Complainant Established Ingredients Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Accused Failed to Discharge Reverse Burden Under Section 139.

The appellant, Suresh Nakra, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) against the respondent, Murugesan Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Statutory Bar Permits Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants Paid Premium for Extra FSI but Abandoned Project; Court Held Retention of Premium Without Benefit Amounts to Unjust Enrichment.

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...