Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Enhances Compensation to Rs.1,80,000 per Hectare. Market value determined based on previous judgment in related appeals.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Hari Narayan Dhande, was the owner of Survey No.2/3, area 4.04 HR, situated at village Bhoyar, Tq. Dist. Yavatmal. The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) initiated acquisition proceedings for the land, and a notification under Section 32(2) of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Act was published in the Government Gazette on 09.03.1995. The Land Acquisition Officer declared an award on 27.11.1997, granting compensation at the rate of Rs.56,000 per hectare along with other statutory benefits. Dissatisfied with the award, the appellant filed Land Acquisition Case No.100/1999 before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Yavatmal, which was decided on 29.07.2005. The appellant then filed the present first appeal before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the counsel for respondent no.3 (MIDC) brought to the court's attention a judgment of this Court in First Appeal No.661/2006, decided on 24.04.2018 by Justice Manish Pitale, which had dismissed MIDC's appeal and upheld compensation at the rate of Rs.1,80,000 per hectare for similarly situated claimants. The High Court, relying on this coordinate bench judgment, held that the market value of the acquired land on the date of notification was Rs.1,80,000 per hectare. Consequently, the court partly allowed the appeal, modifying the trial court's decree to enhance the compensation to Rs.1,80,000 per hectare, along with statutory benefits. The court did not elaborate on any other issues or arguments.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Compensation Enhancement - Market Value Determination - Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Act, 1960, Section 32(2) - The appellant-claimant sought enhancement of compensation for acquired land. The High Court, relying on its earlier judgment in First Appeal No.661/2006 (decided on 24.04.2018) which fixed market value at Rs.1,80,000 per hectare for similarly situated lands, held that the same rate should apply. The appeal was partly allowed, modifying the trial court's decree to enhance compensation to Rs.1,80,000 per hectare with statutory benefits. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether any interference is required in the judgment and decree dated 29.07.2005 in Land Acquisition Case No.100/1999 passed by Civil Judge Senior Division, Yavatmal?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal is partly allowed. Appellant will be entitled to receive compensation at the rate of Rs.1,80,000 per hectare instead of the rate awarded by the trial court.

Law Points

  • Land acquisition compensation
  • market value determination
  • reliance on previous coordinate bench judgment
  • enhancement of compensation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (10) 193

First Appeal No.341/2008

2018-10-31

V. M. Deshpande, J.

Mr. A. Sambre for appellant, Mr. A. Balpande, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2, Mr. M. M. Agnihotri for respondent no.3

Hari Narayan Dhande

The State of Maharashtra, The Sub Divisional and Land Acquisition Officer, Yavatmal, The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against judgment and decree in land acquisition reference for enhancement of compensation.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought enhancement of compensation for acquired land.

Filing Reason

Dissatisfaction with the award of compensation at Rs.56,000 per hectare by the Land Acquisition Officer.

Previous Decisions

Land Acquisition Officer declared award on 27.11.1997 granting compensation at Rs.56,000 per hectare. Civil Judge Senior Division, Yavatmal decided Land Acquisition Case No.100/1999 on 29.07.2005.

Issues

Whether any interference is required in the judgment and decree dated 29.07.2005 in Land Acquisition Case No.100/1999 passed by Civil Judge Senior Division, Yavatmal?

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel for respondent no.3 pointed out judgment in First Appeal No.661/2006 where compensation was fixed at Rs.1,80,000 per hectare.

Ratio Decidendi

The market value of the acquired land on the date of publication of notification was Rs.1,80,000 per hectare, as determined by a coordinate bench in First Appeal No.661/2006, and the same rate should apply to the present appellant.

Judgment Excerpts

In view of the aforesaid finding already arrived by this Court that the market price of the acquired land on the date of publication of notification was Rs.1,80,000/, in my view, this Court is required to modify the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court.

Procedural History

Notification under Section 32(2) of MIDC Act published on 09.03.1995. Land Acquisition Officer declared award on 27.11.1997 at Rs.56,000 per hectare. Appellant filed Land Acquisition Case No.100/1999 before Civil Judge Senior Division, Yavatmal, which was decided on 29.07.2005. Appellant then filed First Appeal No.341/2008 before the Bombay High Court. During hearing, judgment in First Appeal No.661/2006 (decided on 24.04.2018) was cited. Present judgment delivered on 31.10.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Act, 1960: Section 32(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Enhances Compensation to Rs.1,80,000 per Hectare. Market value determined based on previous judgment in related appeals.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Revision Against Tenant in Rent Control Eviction Suit — Notice of Demand Must Be Express Under Section 15(2) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Landlord's Failure to Demand Rent in Notice and Tenant's Regu...