Search Results for "re-settlement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "re-settlement"

490 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 490 result(s)

Supreme Court

Land Acquisition - Rejection of Release Request - Discrimination Claim - Compensation Under 2013 Act. Supreme Court held that the appellant’s land acquisition was valid, rejecting claims of discrimination but granted enhanced compensation under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, invoking Article 142.

1 Apr 2025

Constitution of India, 1950 (COI) – Article 142 – Supreme Court exercised its discretionary power to grant compensation under the 2013 Act...

High Court

Acquisition Proceedings Declared Lapsed. Non-payment of Compensation and Non-possession of Acquired Land for Over Five Years Resulted in Lapsing of Acquisition Proceedings Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

10 Mar 2025

Mere mutation entries without kabjepatti or credible evidence of possession do not establish the taking over of physical possession. Absence of notice...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Land Within 10 Years. Petitioners' land reserved for school purposes not acquired despite notice; court declares reservation lapsed and directs publication of notification.

24 Feb 2025

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Gat No. 105/2+3 at Village Bale, Solapur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for CIDCO Project, Upholds Validity of Acquisition Under 2013 Act. Court holds that acquisition under the 1894 Act had lapsed but was validly revived under the 2013 Act, and that the Court Receiver was not in possession at the time of taking over.

26 Nov 2024

The case involves three writ petitions concerning the acquisition of land bearing survey no. 59/8 at Village Asudgaon, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Enemy Property Tax Exemption Case — Property Tax Levyable on Lessee Despite Union Ownership. Article 285(2) of Constitution Enables Municipal Corporation to Impose Property Tax on Lessee of Union Property Even if Union Itself is Exempt Under Article 285(1).

22 Feb 2024

The present civil appeal arises from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which allowed a writ petition filed by the respondent-assessee, holding th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case, Reversing High Court's Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Did Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 as Possession Was Taken, Satisfying Only One of Twin Conditions Required for Deemed Lapse.

20 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the Delhi Development Authority against a judgment of the Delhi High Court which had declared that land acquisiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court Order on Lapse Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013. High Court Erred in Declaring Acquisition Lapsed as Possession Was Taken and Compensation Deposited Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and Writ Petitioner Lacked Locus Standi as Subsequent Purchaser.

20 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court addressed an appeal by the Government of NCT of Delhi against a High Court judgment that declared land acquisition proceedings lapse...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 When Possession Could Not Be Taken Due to Court Stay, and Stay Period Must Be Excluded from Five-Year Computation.

20 Jan 2023

The dispute originated from land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The respondent landowner filed a writ petitio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Did Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, Following Overruling of Pune Municipal Corporation Precedent.

16 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the Delhi Development Authority appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquisit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Landowners' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute - Restores Enhanced Compensation Based on Proper Market Value Assessment. High Court Erred in Setting Aside Reference Court's Determination by Inappropriately Comparing Acquired Land with Agricultural Sale Exemplars Without Considering Proximity to Developed Areas Under Sections 4 and 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

31 Jan 2022

The dispute concerned compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for resettlement of persons affected by the Lower Wardha sub...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)