Search Results for "railway administration"

847 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 847 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Mother and Wife Held to be Dependents Under Section 123(b) of Railways Act, 1989. Tribunal erred in denying compensation to mother and wife of deceased passenger who died from accidental fall from train.

The case involves an appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenging the order dated 18th July 2014 passed by the Railwa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order for Compassionate Appointment. Rejection of elder brother's application for producing bogus certificate does not bar younger son's independent claim for compassionate appointment under Railway Establishment Code.

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India (Railway) against an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) directing consideration of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Bona Fide Passenger Despite Wrong Train. Identification of Deceased by Son Through Belongings Sufficient Under Railways Act, 1989.

The appeal was filed by the legal heirs of deceased Motiram Meshram against the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, which rejected their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway's Appeal in Fatal Accident Claim — Negligence Proved by Circumstantial Evidence and Res Ipsa Loquitur. Compensation of Rs.50,000 awarded under Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 upheld as just and reasonable.

The case arises from a fatal accident on 5.1.1982 between Currey Road and Parel railway stations, resulting in the death of Ashokkumar, husband of res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator; Validity of 20% Claim Cap Clause Under Scrutiny. The Court Examines Whether a Contractual Condition Limiting Arbitration to Claims Not Exceeding 20% of Contract Value Is Arbitrary and Discriminatory.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 7 May 2018 between a contractor and the Central Railways for the preparation of design and structural drawings...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Interest Rate Reduced from 18% to 9%. The court held that the arbitrator's award did not violate public policy but reduced the interest rate as excessive under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award dated 8 October 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reduction of Penalty in Disciplinary Proceeding for Pay Fixation Misconduct — Proportionality of Punishment Upheld. Court held that while misconduct was established, removal was disproportionate and Appellate Authority's modification to reduction to lowest scale was justified.

The petitioner, Rajesh Ashok Mankar, was employed as a Computer Operator with Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (KRCL). He was initially appointed on...