Search Results for "private quarrel"

873 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 873 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 5, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Satara on 17/5/2010 in Sessions Case No. 38 of 2009 under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Hears Confirmation of Death Sentence Awarded for Triple Murder and Appeal Challenging Conviction. Convict Argues Prosecution Evidence Including Dying Declarations and Eyewitness Testimony is Unreliable and Seizure Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act is Invalid.

The High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench heard a reference for confirmation of death sentence and an appeal filed by the convict Imdad Ali Waid Ali Sa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder Conviction Based on Eyewitness and Medical Evidence. Appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC for causing death by brick blow confirmed despite minor discrepancies in prosecution case.

The appellant, Sagar Bhagwan Dhembre, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of Harshal Avinash Joshi under Section 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Assault in Axe Attack Case. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for causing death by axe blows on head and under Section 324 IPC for causing hurt to another person.

The appellant, Balu Sitaram Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for the murder of Arjun and for causing hurt to Sandeep un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The Bombay High Court, by a common judgment, allowed three criminal appeals filed by Akshay Laxman Pachphule (original accused No. 1), Mayur Vilas Pac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC Established Despite Acquittal of Some Accused.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from the same judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhokar, Dist. Nanded, convicting the appellant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Shrinivas @ Shenu Shirsappa Ayyappa Swami and Vyankatesh @ Vyankati Narsimallu Sagar, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Removal of Municipal Councillors and Appointment of Administrator. Petitioners Allege Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Compliance with Section 41 of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 in Removal Orders.

The matter comprised two writ petitions. W.P. No. 101601/2025 was filed by elected councillors of Gadag-Betageri City Municipal Council challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Writ Petition Seeks Exemption from 10-Year Study Requirement for Linguistic Minority PG-NEET Seats. Challenge to Government Order ED 165 Mahiti 2018 on Grounds of Discrimination as Exemption Granted for Government Seats Not Extended to Linguistic Minority Private Seats.

The writ petition was filed by Mr. N. Shreyas, an MBBS graduate who completed his internship and appeared for NEET-PG 2022, securing All India Rank 43...