Search Results for "mandatory examination"

2937 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2937 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence of Repeat Offender in NDPS Act Case. Accused Found with 188 kg Hashish and Previously Convicted; Enhanced Punishment Under Section 31-A of NDPS Act Imposed for Possession of Commercial Quantity.

The case arose from a letter dated 13-01-2002 sent by the Zonal Director, NCB, Ahmedabad to the Zonal Director, NCB, Mumbai, informing about the inter...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Easement of Necessity Over Cart Track in Partition Dispute Between Brothers. Plaintiff Granted Declaration and Mandatory Injunction for Access to Landlocked Property Under Section 13 of Indian Easements Act, 1882.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit between two brothers, T.M. Thiruvenkatasamy (defendant) and M.Sundararajan (plaintiff), concerning f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Pronounces Oral Judgment in Cross Appeals Involving Kidnapping, Murder, and Conspiracy Under IPC Sections 364-A, 302, 120-B, 201/34. Both State and Accused Filed Appeals Against Trial Court Conviction and Sentence, With the Accused Challenging the Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence.

The present matter concerns two criminal appeals arising from the judgment and order dated 30.11.2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Testamentary Suit Seeking Probate of Will Due to Forgery and Undue Influence. The Court Held That the Propounders Failed to Prove Due Execution and Testamentary Capacity, and That the Earlier Charitable Will Remained Unrevoked.

This testamentary suit arose from a petition for probate of the alleged last will of Jimmy Keki Tarachand, dated 27 December 2004. The original plaint...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Returning Plaint for Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction in Suit for Injunction and Damages. The Court Held That for Order VII Rule 11 CPC, Only Plaint Averments Are Relevant, Not Evidence.

The appellant, Bharat Bhushan Gupta, filed a suit for mandatory and prohibitory injunction and recovery of damages against the respondents, Pratap Nar...