Search Results for "labour welfare"

737 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 737 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Commissioner of Labour's Order Holding Religious Trust as Commercial Establishment Under Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948. Trust's Charitable and Religious Objects Exclude It from Definition of Commercial Establishment Under Section 2(4) of the Act.

The petitioner, Shri Vatavriksha Swami Maharaj Devasthan, Akkalkot, is a religious and charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Refers Questions on Applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act to Temples to Full Bench. Division Bench Finds Arguable Questions Whether Temple is 'Commercial Establishment' Under Karnataka Shops Act and Whether Prior Precedent on Temple Employee's Gratuity is Correct.

The dispute arose when a former employee of Shri Mookambika Temple, Kollur, claimed gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 after his superan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination of Hostel Superintendents in Tribal Area — Retrenchment Without Notice and Without Following Government Resolutions Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Termination Order Casting Stigma Without Inquiry Set Aside; Reinstatement with Back Wages Granted.

The petitioners, Smt. Kokila Gujrya Padvi and Divlya @ Dinkar Rotu Padavi, were employed as Hostel Superintendents by the Adivasi Satpuda Shikshan Pra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Principal Employer Challenging Gratuity Liability for Contractor's Employees. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Section 7 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Gratuity of Contractor's Workmen When Contractor Fails to Pay.

The petitioner, Cummins (I) Limited, an engineering company, challenged a common order dated 30 May 2003 passed by the Controlling Authority under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010366622012_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Notification Restricting Oxytocin Manufacture to Public Sector. Notification under Section 26A of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 held invalid for being arbitrary and disproportionate to the objective of curbing misuse.

The case involves a challenge to a notification issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare under Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.

This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Human Trafficking and Child Labour Case — Petitioners Entitled to Bail as They Are Not Required for Custodial Investigation and Have No Criminal Antecedents.

The petitioners, accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Crime No. 288/2014 registered at Chamarajpet Police Station, Bangalore, filed a petition under Section 438 of...