Search Results for "jurisdiction concession"

1110 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1110 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Absorption of Reserved Panel Candidate After Panel Expiry. Direction to absorb respondent as Technician in All India Radio set aside as it violated Recruitment Rules and the limited right of a candidate in a reserved panel.

The Union of India and All India Radio appealed against a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court's direction to absorb the respondent, as a Technic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Second Appeals in RERA Delayed Possession Matter. Builder Challenges Appellate Tribunal's Direction to Pay Interest at 10.05% p.a. from February 2014.

These Second Appeals were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by Runwal Constructions, a registered partnership firm, challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5290 OF 2013

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.

The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Compensation for Alleged Illegal Detention and Torture by Karnataka Police. Petitioner Alleges Violation of D.K. Basu Guidelines and Extortion via ATM Withdrawals During Unaccounted Custody.

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by the wife of an alleged detenu under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking compensation ...