Search Results for "invalid detention order"

324 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 324 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Consideration of Bail and Lack of Compelling Reasons. Detenu's Release on Bail in Multiple FIRs Not Considered, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid Under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, father of the detenu Yash Vijay Sashte, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a detention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Bootlegging Without Public Order Disturbance. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Mere Law and Order Violations; Nexus to Public Order Must Be Established.

The petitioner, Rajendrasingh Bavari, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 18.02.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Wardha under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Invalid Delegation of Powers. Delegation Order Under Section 3(2) Must Record Satisfaction Based on Material and Reasons; Absence Renders Delegation and Subsequent Detention Orders Invalid.

The petitioner, Alakshit Rajesh Ambade, challenged the legality of a preventive detention order dated 02.07.2022 passed by the Commissioner of Police,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Court holds that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenue's bail status and the availability of alternative remedies under ordinary law, rendering the detention order invalid.

The petitioner, Ram Raju @ Jatalya Umap, challenged a preventive detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Section 3(2) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Failure to Furnish Bail Application and Order Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Dhanaji Nivrutti Patil, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 21st July 2017 passed by the District Magistrate, Sangli, un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Detenu in Judicial Custody — Failure to Show Imminent Possibility of Bail Renders Order Invalid. Preventive detention cannot be sustained when detenu is already in custody and no cogent material exists to indicate likely release on bail.

The petitioner, father of the detenu Jaidev @ Rajubhai @ J.D. Ramji Mishra, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution chall...