Search Results for "intellectual property rights"

293 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 293 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers GST Liability on Royalty Payments to Court Receiver in Commercial Property Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Payments to a Court Receiver Under Order XL CPC Constitute Taxable Supply Under the CGST Act, 2017 and Whether GST Should be Discharged via Reverse Charge Mechanism.

The Bombay High Court, in a Court Receiver's Report arising from a commercial suit for recovery of possession of three shops used as a restaurant, exa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition as Foreign Company Failed to Comply with Registration Requirements Under Sections 592 and 599 of Companies Act, 1956. Petitioner, a foreign company with a place of business in India, cannot maintain a winding-up petition without registering under the Act.

The petitioner, Willis Europe B.V., a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands with its principal place of business in the United Kingdo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 506 Part II IPC. Conviction for Criminal Intimidation Upheld Despite Acquittal for Rape and Related Offences; Threat to Upload Bathing Video Constitutes Offence Under Part II Section 506 IPC.

The Supreme Court dismissed a criminal appeal challenging the conviction and sentence under Part II of Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute — Contractual Breach Without Deception Does Not Attract Section 420 IPC.

The petitioner, Sussanne Khan, a sole proprietor of a design firm, was engaged by the respondent no. 3, Mudhit Gupta, under a written contract to prov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules on Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Under Section 26 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015. The Mere Filing of a Section 34 Petition Does Not Trigger Automatic Stay; Award-Holder Can Execute Unless Stay Granted.

The snippet of the judgment deals with Chamber Summonses in Execution Applications arising from an arbitral award. The dispute involves Enercon GmbH a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Prohibition Against Commercial Court in Arbitration Matter. Commercial Court's Jurisdiction Upheld Under Section 2(1)(c) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and Petitioner Estopped from Challenging Jurisdiction After Having Earlier Invoked It.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of prohibition to restrain the LXXXV Additional City Civil a...