Search Results for "eye-witness identification"

320 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 320 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt the role of each accused in the murder.

The case involves four appeals against a common judgment dated 19/01/2013 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, convicting the appellants fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction in Arson and Murder Case. Accused Challenged Conviction Under Sections 302, 436, 342, 143, 147, 148, 149, 120B IPC; State Filed Appeal Seeking Enhancement of Sentence.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay adjudicated eight criminal appeals filed against the judgment dated 9 May 2005 by the 4th Additional Sessions J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Dock Identification and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction under Section 395 read with Section 397 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was doubtful and recovery of weapon was not linked to crime.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Vinod @ Nasmulla against his conviction under Section 395 read with Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC in Dowry Murder Case; Questions Sustainability of Conviction When Co-Accused Were Acquitted. Appeal Seeks Re-appreciation of Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Opinion on Strangulation; No Final Verdict in Provided Text.

In this criminal appeal before the High Court of Karnataka, the appellant, accused No.1, challenged his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Stabbing Motivated by Land Dispute Between Cousins. The court found the prosecution's case proved beyond reasonable doubt based on eyewitness testimony and motive, dismissing the appeal.

The appellant, Maroti Anandrao Todase, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kelapur for the murder of his cousin brother, Raju, under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2005

The case arose from Special Case No. 10 of 2001 before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, where eight accused faced trial on charges of kidnap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of a Six-Year-Old Girl Under POCSO Act. Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Pravin S/o Suryabhanji Gube, was convicted by the learned Extra Joint Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur on 12.9.2018 in Special Child P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Death by Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC Upheld Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.

The petitioner, Domnic Luis, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Margao, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-A (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder in Family Feud Over Debt. Common intention under Section 34 IPC not established for all accused; conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed for main assailants based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

The case arises from a family dispute over a loan of Rs. 10,000. On 27 January 2014, the deceased, Bharat, was attacked by four accused persons—Rame...