GULFISHA FATIMA
1 Jan 1970The present appeals before the Supreme Court arise from a common judgment of the High Court of Delhi which affirmed the rejection of bail applications...
Search Results for "expeditious execution"
428 result(s) found
Found 428 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Pre-emption Claim Under Section 22 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 — Testamentary Succession Bars Intestate Right. Property Devolution by Will Excludes Statutory Right of Pre-emption as Section 22 Applies Only to Intestate Property.
25 Oct 2024The case involves a dispute over a suit property (Plot No.21, Laxmi Nagar, Nagpur) originally purchased by late Kashinath Subhedar in the name of his ...
- 2702
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Quarry Lease Applications under Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules. Petitioners sought processing of pre-2016 amendment applications under unamended rules as per Rule 8-B.
16 Aug 2019Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging endorsements issued by the Department of Mines and Geology rejecting ap...
- 65
High Court
Petitioner Challenges NCLT Order Admitted Under Section 7 IBC on Ground of Non-Pronouncement and Violation of NCLT Rules. High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Petition Alleging Order Non-Est for Lack of Pronouncement in Open Court.
29 Nov 2019Not mentioned - judgment text incomplete...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Partnership Retirement Dispute. The Court Examines Whether the Arbitrator Erred in Rejecting Petitioners' Claims and Imposing Costs Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
15 Oct 2019Background: The dispute arose out of a partnership firm, M/s. Prospective Traders, constituted in 1977 by three family trusts. In 1985, the petitioner...
- 29
High Court
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.
15 Oct 2024The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...
- 666
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Challenging MCGM Notice Under Section 354A of MMC Act — Suit Held Not Maintainable Due to Bar of Section 527 of MMC Act and Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 354A(3). The court held that the civil court's jurisdiction is barred when a statute provides a complete mechanism for redressal.
9 Oct 2013The appellant, M/s. Akash Impex, a registered partnership firm, acquired suit property Gala No.24/25, CTS No. 240-C at Khetani Industrial Estate, Kurl...
- 147
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Considers Multiple Writ Petitions Against Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank's Securitisation Action Over Sugar Factory Assets. The Core Legal Question is Whether a Co-operative Bank Qualifies as a 'Bank' Under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, and the Validity of Measures Taken Under Section 13(4) Thereof.
19 Dec 2006The matter arose from multiple writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) concerning the assets of Shankar Sahakari Sakhar K...
- 41
Tribunals
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Transfer of Appeal from Non-Functional State Commission to Another State Commission Under Inherent Powers. The Commission held that Section 62 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 does not expressly confer power to transfer appeals, but inherent power exists to prevent failure of justice when a State Commission is non-functional.
21 May 2025The matter pertains to a Transfer Application filed by M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, the appellant, seeking transfer of an appeal pending before t...
- 103
