Search Results for "detention order challenge"

733 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 733 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Bootlegger Due to Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish threat to public order.

The case involves a challenge to a preventive detention order dated 21.01.2026 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City, detaining Champaben ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MCOCA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by Detaining Authority. Failure to Consider Relevant Material and Mechanical Reproduction of Grounds Renders Preventive Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, father of the detenu Ashish @ Sonu Manmurad Pande, filed a writ petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Consideration of Representation. Failure to Consider Detenu's Representation Before Confirmation Violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Wasim @ Mukri A.Salar, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders for Violation of Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution. Non-supply of Bail Application and Bail Order in Connected Crime Renders Detention Invalid Despite Section 5A of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Sayed Jafar Sayed Nasir, challenged two detention orders dated 20th February 2018 and 12th March 2018 passed by the Commissioner of Po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Supplied.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Kirti Vanabhai Patel, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the detentio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Detention Under COFEPOSA Act for Smuggling of High Speed Diesel. Non-Supply of Bail Order Held Not Fatal to Detention Order as Detenu Was Aware of It.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Samad Ismail Deshmukh, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the deten...