Search Results for "deficit amount"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "deficit amount"

775 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 775 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Contributory Negligence from 70% to 30% Based on Lack of Evidence. Claimant Driver Injured in Head-On Collision; Tribunal's Finding of Self-Negligence Set Aside as No Material to Show Rash Driving by Claimant.

11 Mar 2026

The appellant, Chaudhary Prakeshbhai Nathabhai, was the original claimant in a motor accident claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Equal Apportionment of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Remarriage of Widow and Dependency of Parents Justify Equal Distribution. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision to distribute compensation equally among widow, father, and mother, considering the widow's remarriage and the parents' dependency.

26 Feb 2026

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Ashokbhai Ravjibhai Sodha-Parmar, died in an accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribu...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Pay and Recover Order Despite Driver Being Minor Without License. Third Party Claimants Entitled to Compensation; Insurer to Recover from Owner Who Knew of Lack of License.

29 Jan 2026

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, by the legal heirs of a deceased person ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeals by Injured Claimants in Motor Accident Case — Enhances Compensation by Applying Correct Multiplier and Granting Future Prospects. Multiplier of 18 applied for 30-year-old claimant with permanent disability under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

27 Jan 2026

The present appeals arise from a common judgment and award dated 09.01.2025 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Dahod, in MAC Petitio...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Wrong Multiplier and Contributory Negligence Finding. Compensation Enhanced by Applying Multiplier of 18, Adding 40% Future Prospects, and Reducing Deduction to 1/4th Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

20 Jan 2026

The case arises from a motor accident on 23.05.2015 when the deceased Savitaben and injured Gautambhai were traveling in a Tavera car to Pavagadh. A t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Return of Counter Claim in Civil Suit — Order 7 Rule 10 CPC Not Applicable to Counter Claims. The trial court erred in returning the counter claim under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC as that provision applies only to plaints, not counter claims; the counter claim must be dealt with under Order 8 Rule 6A CPC.

12 Jun 2023

The appellant-plaintiff, M/S. Shah Polymers, filed a suit (O.S.No.337/2008) against the respondents-defendants, M/S. Canara Poly Pack Ltd. and another...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Multiplier Corrected from 15 to 18. The court held that the Tribunal erred in applying a multiplier of 15 for a 60-year-old claimant, and the correct multiplier under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is 18.

11 Sep 2019

The present appeal was filed by the original claimant, Krushna Shivaji Patil, under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Restoration of Suit Despite Plaint Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11(f) CPC — Power to Restore Exists Under Order VII Rule 13 CPC. The Court held that rejection under Order VII Rule 11(f) is not a decree and the Trial Court has jurisdiction to restore the suit upon sufficient cause being shown.

12 Sep 2017

The case arises from a dispute between family members over property. The Plaintiff (Respondent No.1) filed Special Civil Suit No.30/2012 seeking parti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Shifting Agreements in MHADA Redevelopment Project — Collector of Stamps Lacked Review Power and Agreements Were for Temporary Shifting, Not Permanent Alternate Accommodation Under Article 25(d) of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

17 Apr 2012

The Petitioner, Guruashish Construction Pvt. Ltd., a builder and developer, entered into a tripartite Joint Development Agreement dated 10 April 2008 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree Under Section 13A(1) of Bombay Rent Act for Bona Fide Requirement of Landlord's Son. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interferable Under Section 115 CPC as No Jurisdictional Error Found.

11 Aug 2005

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the eviction decree pass...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)