Search Results for "deemed acquisition lapsed"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "deemed acquisition lapsed"

362 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 362 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Development Authority in Land Acquisition Lapse Dispute. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) as Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, Following Constitution Bench Ruling in Indore Development Authority.

19 Apr 2023

The dispute arose from a land acquisition matter where the Delhi Development Authority appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Dispute Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. High Court's Declaration of Lapse Reversed as Possession Was Admittedly Taken, Applying Constitution Bench Ruling in Indore Development Authority Which Overruled Prior Precedent on Compensation Payment Requirement.

13 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the Union of India against a Delhi High Court judgment that declared land acquisition proceedings had lapsed unde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Did Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act as Possession Was Taken, Overruling Precedent Based on Non-Payment Alone.

10 Feb 2023

The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 30.05.2016 by the High Court of Delhi, which allowed a writ petition and declared that land acquisiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court Order on Lapse Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013. High Court Erred in Declaring Acquisition Lapsed as Possession Was Taken and Compensation Deposited Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and Writ Petitioner Lacked Locus Standi as Subsequent Purchaser.

20 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court addressed an appeal by the Government of NCT of Delhi against a High Court judgment that declared land acquisition proceedings lapse...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 as Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Claim Compensation or Challenge Proceedings After Section 4 Notification.

13 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the State of Haryana appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquisition lapsed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition for De-reservation of Land Reserved for Playground Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition for Over Two Decades. The court held that the reservation under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, 1966 lapsed as no acquisition proceedings were initiated despite notice, directing de-reservation.

18 Nov 2022

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No. 362/2B1 at Chalisgaon, challenged the continued reservation of a portion of their land for a 'play-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Notice Issued to Deceased Person Invalid. The court held that a notice under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 issued to a person who had died before the notice is invalid, and since possession was not taken and compensation not paid, the acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

8 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Vithoba Ravaji Jadhav (since deceased through legal heir Subhash Vithoba Jadhav), owned land Gat No.422/2 at Vadgaon Bhande, Tal. Daun...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Reservation Lapse Case Under MRTP Act — Notice Held Valid and Acquisition Steps Inadequate. The court held that the second notice under Section 127 was not premature and the municipality failed to take adequate acquisition steps within 24 months, resulting in lapsing of reservation.

1 Jan 2019

The appellant, a partnership firm and joint owner of land in Survey No.7, Mouja Durgavada, Morshi, had its land reserved for shopping centre and garde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition in MRTP Act Purchase Notice Case - Deemed Lapse of Reservation Upheld. Amendment to Section 127(1) Enlarging Period for Acquisition Steps Does Not Apply to Purchase Notices Served Before Amendment, as Right to Lapse Had Already Accrued.

22 Dec 2016

The petitioners, owners of 0.54 hectares of land in Pusad, had their land reserved for a primary school under the final development plan published on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Irrigation Project Due to Delay in Section 6 Declaration. Declaration Issued Beyond One-Year Statutory Period Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Rendering Acquisition Proceedings Null and Void.

11 Sep 2015

The petitioners, Baban Homaji Phadtare and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the notification d...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)