Search Results for "corporate name"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "corporate name"

1310 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1310 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Lenders Against Order Setting Aside Sale of Mortgaged Property Under SARFAESI Act — Held That Sale Was Not Conducted in a Fair and Transparent Manner and That the Borrower Was Not Given Adequate Notice of the Sale.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an appeal by a consortium of banks and a trustee company (the lenders) against an order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) setting ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction. Court upholds MCGM's action under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for building without valid permission and in violation of development plan reservations.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioners, Kamla Industrial Park Ltd and Metallica Industries Ltd, challenged the demolition notice and stop-work notice issued by the Municipal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by ITAT. Tribunal's order set aside for failing to consider the TPO's detailed analysis and rejecting comparables without proper reasoning under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

27 Feb 2020

The appeal was filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 6 under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appe...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Approval of Resolution Plan for Lack of Standing — Appellant Not an Aggrieved Person Under Section 61 of IBC, 2016. The appellant, not being a party to the CIRP and whose claim was not admitted, lacks locus standi to challenge the order approving the resolution plan.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an appeal filed by Boorugu Infra Projects Private Limited in consortium with Vishwanath Projects Limited against the order of the Na...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to Service Tax on Advocates. The Levy Under Section 65(105)(zzzzm) of the Finance Act, 1994 is Challenged as Ultra Vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 265 of the Constitution.

15 Dec 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints for Dishonour of Cheques Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice and Absence of Averments Regarding Debt Legally Enforceable. The court held that the complainant failed to establish the existence of a legally enforceable debt and that the demand notice was not served in accordance with Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

26 Apr 2021

The judgment involves multiple criminal writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pr...

Tribunals

NCLAT Chennai Adjudicates on Condonation of Delay in Company Appeal, Considering Supreme Court's COVID-19 Limitation Extension. The Court examined whether the appeal filed on 28.05.2021 against the 31.01.2020 order approving resolution plan was within time in light of Section 61 IBC and the Supreme Court's orders excluding limitation period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022.

1 Jan 1970

The case arose from an appeal against the National Company Law Tribunal order dated 31.01.2020 approving a resolution plan for Vaksh Steels Pvt. Ltd. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Third Delegation of Voting Rights in Cooperative Society Elections; Aggregation of Delegations Under Different Cooperative Enactments Held to Trigger Bar Under Section 21 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

15 Dec 2025

These three writ petitions, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, were heard together by the Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench. The ...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)