Search Results for "child definition"

589 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 589 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Suspicion of Character. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder of his sister with axe due to suspicion about her character.

The appellant, Pramod @ Pintya s/o Bhaurao Bodkhe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Darwha, District Yavatmal, in Sessions Trial No.10/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Suspension of Sentence in POCSO Case Where Victim Was Minor. Court Holds That Victim's Age Was Proved as 13 Years and Consent of Child is Immaterial Under Section 2(d) of POCSO Act, and Presumptions Under Sections 29 and 30 Apply.

This criminal miscellaneous petition arose from a conviction under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The petitioner, a man fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Act — High Court Erred in Reducing Offence Despite Victim's Age Below 12 Years. Age of Victim Below 12 Years Mandates Application of Section 6, Not Section 4 of POCSO Act.

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had reduced the conviction of the respondent, Sonu Kushwaha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Hanumantharayappa, was convicted by the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madhugiri, in Sessions Case No. 81/2013 for the offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping of Minor Girl. Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offences Under Sections 5(1) and 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 363, 366A, 376 of IPC.

The appellant, Rupesh Parasram Nehare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Warora in Special (POCSO) Case No. 05 of 2015 for offences under Section 5(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Termination of Compassionate Appointment Based on Invalid Adoption. Adoption Deed Notarized After Employee's Medical Retirement Does Not Confer Eligibility Under Government Resolution Dated 26.10.1994.

The petitioner, Shaikh Jamir Sayed Saifoddin, challenged the judgment of the Labour Court dismissing his complaint (ULP No.13/2011) and the Industrial...