Search Results for "bribe"

749 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 749 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Purushottam Vasant Joshi, was a Maintenance Supervisor in the Taluka Inspector of Land Records office at Miraj. He was convicted by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Proof of Demand. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dansinh Rupsinh Parmar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Second Fast Track Court, Amreli in Special Case (ACB) No. 47/19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction Under Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, C. Krishnaiah, was accused no. 2 in a corruption case before the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysore, in Spl. Case No. 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mahalingappa, a retired Junior Engineer of KPTCL, was convicted by the Special Judge and Principal Sessions Judge, Bidar, in Special Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Policemen and Private Citizen in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) and Section 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was interested and testimony uncorroborated.

The case involves two appeals against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants in Criminal Appeal No.248/02 were police...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Bawasingh Puransingh Khaira, was convicted by the Special Judge of Greater Bombay in Special Case No. 24/89 under the Prevention of Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in PC Act Case — Complainant's Testimony Unreliable and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 19 June 2001 passed by the Special Judge, Pune, acquitting the respondent Bajar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yashwant Sambhaji Dadmal, a police constable, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur in Special Case No.6 of 1999 for offences ...