Search Results for "Special Mention Accounts"

658 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 658 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment on Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Input Tax Credit Under KVAT Act. Interpretation of Section 10(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Availment of Input Tax Credit Irrespective of Invoice Month Framed the Core Issue.

A batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed by various companies including...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Division Bench Order in Trade Mark Infringement Suit Due to Non-maintainable Intra-court Appeal. The Single Judge's Order Granting Time to File Affidavit-in-Opposition Was Not a 'Judgment' Under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, Making the Appeal Inadmissible.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff against the appellant-defendants for infringement of the registered trade mark '...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Heard Appeal Against Dismissal of Widow's Partition Suit. Court Examined Claim of Absolute Ownership Under Section 14(1) Hindu Succession Act and Entitlement Under Jamkhandi State Act.

The dispute pertained to the joint Hindu family estate of Sir Parshuram Bhau Patwardhan, the erstwhile ruler of Jamkhandi, who died in 1924. His secon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against WPL in Super Bazar Revival Case — No Willful Disobedience of Orders Found. Revival Scheme Implemented Under Court Supervision; Payments Made as Directed.

The judgment pertains to contempt petitions filed against M/s Writers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd. (WPL) alleging willful disobedience of court orders in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Summary Suit for Recovery of Money. Order 6 Rule 2(3) CPC does not require dates and sums in figures and words in plaint, and Order 37 Rule 2 CPC does not mandate separate verification.

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants (original defendants) against the order dated 07/11/2022 passed by the 14th Joint C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Oral Agreement for Sale of Basement Premises. Agreement Not Proved and Relief Barred by Limitation and Doctrine of Part Performance.

The plaintiffs, a partnership firm, filed a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement dated 30.11.1977 for the purchase of a basement-cum-god...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Passing Off Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Proprietary Rights Over Trademark 'Suratee Tobacco Company'. The Court held that the plaintiff, as a partner, cannot claim exclusive ownership of the partnership trademark without proving dissolution and assignment.

The appellant, Syed Zakirali, filed a civil suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the respondents from passing off their goods as those of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Jurisdictional Challenge in Admiralty Suit Filed Without Vessel in Territorial Waters. Suit Held Maintainable When Arrest Warrant Executed upon Vessel's Subsequent Arrival, Following Geetanjali Woolen Precedent.

The case involves an admiralty suit in rem filed by Great Pacific Navigation (Holdings) Corporation Limited, a Hong Kong company, against the vessel M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Waqf Act Jurisdiction Dispute - Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction For Non-Notified Properties, Civil Court Retains Authority For Property Status Determination.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellants against Respondents, setting aside the High Court order and allowing the application under Or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court hears appeal against CESTAT order upholding duty demand and confiscation of diamonds due to shortage and non-compliance with export obligations — substantial questions raised on interpretation of Notification No. 177/94-Cus and para 8.78B of Handbook of Procedures.

The appellant, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting gold jewellery studded with diamonds at its unit in the Santacruz Electronics...