Search Results for "Section 38(3)"

523 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 523 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Informant's Petition for Additional Charge in Summary Trial Case. Court holds that once charge is framed under Section 211 CrPC, no further charge can be added in a summary trial as per Section 262 CrPC.

The petitioner, Jainab Sayyed Akhtar Ali, the original informant, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement for Sale Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Establish Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract.

The original plaintiff, Vijay Laxmipati Dasari (since deceased, represented by his legal heirs), filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Decree for Specific Performance in Suit Involving Subsequent Purchasers. The trial court had decreed specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands, directing the original vendor and later purchasers to execute a joint sale deed.

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands. The first defendant, the owner, agreed to sell the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeals Against Specific Performance Decree in Agricultural Land Sale Agreement Dispute. The dispute involved claims of tampering, cancellation of agreement, and subsequent sales to third parties.

The appeals arise out of a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural lands bearing various survey numbers, measuring a total ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Criminal Defamation Laws. The Petitioners Contend that Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 CrPC Violate Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, with Subramanian Swamy as the lead petitioner, challengi...