Search Results for "Section 28(1)"

585 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 585 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Landlords' Appeal in Rent Control Eviction Case Due to Insufficient Evidence of Danger to Tenanted Portions. Eviction Decrees Set Aside as Municipal Demolition Notice and Other Grounds Under Sections 15 and 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Were Not Satisfactorily Proven.

The dispute involved landlords appealing against a Bombay High Court judgment that invalidated eviction decrees against two tenants under the Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Amendment of Plaint Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC in Trademark Passing Off Suit. The Petitioner Challenges Order Allowing Change of Prior Use Date from 2022 to 2016 as Fundamentally Altering the Suit.

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 08.06.2026 passed by the Commercial Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Tenants' Revision Petitions in Eviction Cases — Landlord's Bona Fide Requirement for Demolition and Reconstruction Established. Eviction orders under Section 21(1)(h) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 upheld as tenants failed to prove hardship outweighs landlord's need.

The case involves three revision petitions filed by tenants (Vinod G., Dr. Narayuan Waddinnavar, and Meena Pawar) against a common order dated 04.02.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court on its Own Motion Proceeds Against Individual for Scandalous Facebook Posts Targeting Judges. Court Stresses That Such Vicious Attacks on Judiciary Constitute Gross Criminal Contempt Undermining Rule of Law.

Suo-motu criminal contempt proceedings were initiated by the Bombay High Court against an individual who, through his Facebook profile, published a se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Executing Court's Refusal to Stay Execution in Mundkar Rights Claim. Court holds that mere filing of a declaration suit before Mamlatdar does not create a right to stay execution proceedings under Order XXI Rule 97, 99, 101 CPC.

The petitioners, Lawrance Pereira and Juliana Pereira, filed Writ Petition No. 611 of 2023 challenging the order dated 06.09.2023 passed by the Execut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Restitution of Conjugal Rights Decree for Husband in Mohomedan Law Case — Wife’s Cruelty Defence Rejected as Unsubstantiated. Wife Failed to Prove Cruelty Under Section 281(2) of Mohomedan Law to Defeat Husband’s Suit for Restitution of Conjugal Rights.

The dispute arose from a Muslim marriage solemnized on 03.05.2014. The husband filed a petition under Section 281(1) of Mohomedan Law for restitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Revision Applications Against Rejection of Discharge in Murder Case: Sufficiency of Prima Facie Material at Stage of Discharge Questioned

The case arose from the brutal murder of Sunil Kumar Lahoria, proprietor of M/s. S.K. Builders and Developers, at Vashi, Navi Mumbai, on 16th February...