Search Results for "Sarla Verma"

840 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 840 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Negligence of Truck Driver Established, Contributory Negligence Not Proved. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation with 6% interest per annum from date of petition.

The judgment arises from two cross-appeals against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangli, dated 28 September 2005 in Claim Petition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Multiplier Applied as Per Sarla Verma Guidelines. Deceased's Income Assessed at Rs.4,500 per Month with 40% Future Prospects, Compensation Enhanced to Rs.6,91,500.

The appellants, original claimants in MACP No.288 of 2001, filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Inadequate Compensation Assessment. Legal Representatives of Deceased Medical Practitioner Granted Enhanced Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, legal representatives of deceased Kamlakar Pawar, filed a motor accident claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Non-Application of Multiplier. Multiplier of 17 applied to 20% permanent disability with notional income of Rs. 4,500 per month for loss of earning capacity.

The appellant, Ramesh Manoharrao Bote, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhoom, seeking compensation for injuries sust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Pillion Rider Covered Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Held that the expression 'any person' in Section 163-A includes a pillion rider and that the petition is maintainable even in a hit-and-run case.

The appellant, Lalita wd/o Rajkumar Sawalkar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which was later converted to a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Permanent Disability. Negligence of Qualis Jeep driver established; no contributory negligence by motorcycle rider; award of Rs. 10,00,000 upheld under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 06.02.2009. The claimant, Hemant Dabolkar, aged 35, was a Branch Manager at M/s Space O...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Enhanced for Widow and Children. Future Prospects and Loss of Consortium Granted Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the claimants (widow, children, and parents of the deceased) against the judgment and award dated 3rd April 2018 in MACP No. 4...