Search Results for "Sales Tax Benefits"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Sales Tax Benefits"

315 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 315 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Deemed Promotion to Retired Employee Despite Disciplinary Proceedings — Employer Cannot Ignore Exoneration by Enquiry Officer. Stigmatic remarks in disagreement order set aside as promotion cannot be denied when employee is exonerated of all charges.

30 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Rajendra S/o Baburao Patil, a retired employee of Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon, filed a writ petition seeking deemed date of promotion to t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Removal of Central Excise Lien on Property Sold Under SARFAESI Act, Orders Registration of Sale Certificate. The Court held that the sale under the SARFAESI Act extinguishes all prior encumbrances, including statutory liens of the Excise Department, and the Sub-Registrar cannot refuse registration of the sale certificate on the ground of such prior encumbrance.

28 Jun 2023

The Petitioner, Ronak Industries, a partnership firm, purchased an immovable property (Survey No.366/5 and 366/6, admeasuring 2400 sq.mtrs, along with...

High Court

High Court Issues Directions in Slum Rehabilitation Writ Petitions; Expresses Grave Concern Over Alleged Fraud. No Final Verdict; Ongoing Investigation into Trafficking of Tenements and Non-Fixation of Transit Rent Under SRA Circular.

20 Jun 2023

The Bombay High Court issued a detailed common order in a batch of writ petitions filed by slum dwellers of the Kolekalyan Slum Rehabilitation Authori...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal of Sugar Factory in Central Excise Duty Dispute — Section 11-D of Central Excise Act, 1944 Applies Even When Exemption Under Section 5-A is Available. The court held that the amount collected as duty from buyers is recoverable under Section 11-D regardless of exemption, and the assessee cannot retain such amount.

8 Sep 2017

The appellant, Jalna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a sugar factory, filed a first appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Answers Referred Questions on Adequacy of Protection Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act and Grant of Interim Injunctions. The Court Examined Whether Section 52 TP Act Provides Sufficient Safeguard to Deny Injunction Pendente Lite and the Role of Notice Registration Under Section 18 of the Indian Registration Act.

4 Oct 2016

The appeal arose from an order of the Trial Court rejecting the appellant's application for temporary injunction in a suit for specific performance of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Victim's Appeal Against Acquittal Under Proviso to Section 372 CrPC — Condonation of Delay Granted. The court held that the victim's right to appeal is independent and delay can be condoned if sufficient cause is shown.

23 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Parbhani District Central Bank Ltd., through its Assistant Manager Digambar s/o Madanrao Parve, filed a criminal writ petition challen...

Supreme Court

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

12 Apr 2012

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Provident Fund Demand — Taj Residency Held Separate Establishment Entitled to Infancy Benefit Under Section 16(1)(d) of EPF Act. The court held that the Taj Residency, Nasik was a newly established hotel with separate identity and not a branch of Hotel President, Mumbai, and thus entitled to infancy protection under Section 16(1)(d) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

11 Feb 2011

The petitioners, Piem Hotels Limited and another, challenged an order of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC) dated 31 March 1999, which he...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Trade Union in Provident Fund Coverage Dispute — Factory Held Not a Branch of Trading Firm Under Section 2A of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. Common ownership and consolidation of accounts insufficient to treat two separate establishments as one integral unit for PF coverage.

3 Feb 2010

The appellant, Mumbai Mazdoor Sangh, a trade union, filed a writ appeal against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing its...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.

1 Jan 1970

The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)