Search Results for "Rule Returnable"

8583 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8583 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Director's Application to Quash Process in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations Under Section 141 NI Act. Director Cannot Be Held Vicariously Liable Without Averment of Being in Charge of Business Conduct.

The applicant, Gaurav Vijay Bhatia, was arraigned as accused No. 3 in a criminal complaint filed by Ramnath P. Subramaniam (respondent No. 1) under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Rule and Interim Relief to Student Whose Admission to MPH Course at TISS Was Cancelled. The Court Observed That Once Admission Is Confirmed and Student Attends Classes, Cancellation Requires Due Process and Compliance With Admission Rules.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by a student, Isha Sharma, against the Tata Institute of Social...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Complaint in NI Act Case for Lack of Vicarious Liability — Petitioner Not a Director or Signatory. Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 requires specific averments of role and consent for vicarious liability of company officers.

The petitioner, Sidharth Chauhan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Habeas Corpus, Orders Release of Detainee Held Beyond Bail Order in MCOC Case. Petitioner's continued detention after being produced pursuant to production warrant and not being remanded was illegal as his earlier bail remained uncancelled.

The petitioner, Amar Shamrao Kolekar, was arrested on 17 September 2012 in connection with CR No. I-347/2012 for offences under Section 394 read with ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Denies Petition to Quash Cheating Charges in E-Rickshaw Sale Case. "Ignorance of Law No Excuse: Court Emphasizes Limited Scope of Quashing Petitions and Upholds Allegations of Cheating"

The Petitioner sought the quashing of criminal proceedings against him for alleged cheating (Section 420 IPC) related to the sale of an unregistered E...