Search Results for "Rule 12(5)"

1657 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1657 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Mother and Wife Held to be Dependents Under Section 123(b) of Railways Act, 1989. Tribunal erred in denying compensation to mother and wife of deceased passenger who died from accidental fall from train.

The case involves an appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenging the order dated 18th July 2014 passed by the Railwa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Authorities in Madras Urban Land Tax Act — Act Held Constitutionally Valid. Levy of 0.4% on Market Value of Urban Land Under Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966 Not Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(f), and Retrospective Operation Reasonable.

The case concerned the constitutional validity of the Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966, which levied a tax on urban land at 0.4% of its market value. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Addresses Challenge to National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) Notifications for Medical Admissions. The court examines the regulatory power of medical councils and the impact on minority educational institutions under Articles 19(1)(g) and 30 of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of writ petitions and transferred cases challenging four notifications issued by the Medical Council of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Maintenance for Wife and Children in Family Dispute — Husband's Revision Dismissed. Court Holds That Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Must Be Adequate to Prevent Destitution and Considers Husband's Income and Obligations.

The case involves three connected petitions arising from a family dispute between Sunita Bennur (wife) and Shamrao Bennur (husband), along with their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below have concurrently found that the plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.

The present second appeal was filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against the judgment and decree d...