Search Results for "Prosecutrix testimony"

517 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 517 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused Head Constable for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Girl. Evidence of Victim and Medical Reports Proved Rape Without Consent and Victim's Age Below 16 Years Made Consent Irrelevant Under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(a) and 323 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The case involved a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against the conviction of a head constable for kidnapping and raping a minor girl. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rajesh Ganesh Uke, was convicted by the 6th Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial 62/2002 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Stepfather in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506(2) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shamim Anwar Khan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane for offences under Sections 376 and 506(2) of the Indian Penal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Based on Consent and Promise of Marriage — Failure to Prove Ingredients of Rape Under Section 375 IPC. Evidence of Victim Contradictory and Medical Evidence Inconsistent with Prosecution Story.

The applicant, Pravin @ Shrikrishna Chandrakant Marathe, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Sindhudurg, for offences under Sections 376, 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Stepfather for Rape of Minor Stepdaughter Under POCSO Act and IPC. The Court held that the testimony of the prosecutrix was reliable and corroborated by medical evidence, and that the sentence of 10 years rigorous imprisonment was adequate.

The case involves two appeals arising from the conviction of the accused, the stepfather of the victim, for rape of a minor. The prosecution case was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 376(2)(f) of IPC. Appellant Contends That Evidence Only Proves Attempt to Rape, Not Penetration, Challenging Conviction for Rape of a Minor Below 12 Years.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant for the rape of a ten-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code. On Novembe...