Search Results for "Proposals pending"

653 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 653 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Demolition of Temple and Construction of Commercial Complex. Petitioners Failed to Establish Temple as Protected Monument Under Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.

The petitioners, residents of Vaidya Wadi, Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the demolition of a temple dedicated to Lord Hanuman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Permission to Start Urdu Medium School. Government Resolution dated 25.09.2013 held applicable to pending proposals, and no vested right to establish school without compliance with policy.

The petitioner, Late Abdul Quadar Patel Gramin Vikas Sanstha Chikhlwardha, through its Secretary, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Rape and Cheating Case Against Applicant in Matrimonial Portal Dispute — No Prima Facie Case of Rape or Deception Established. Relationship was Consensual and Complainant was Aware of Applicant's Marital Status and Identity.

The applicant, Nandan Sadanand Bendarkar, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).

The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...