Search Results for "Pension Rights"

440 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 440 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Writ Petition for Temporary Status and Benefits to Ad Hoc Junior Engineers. Kandla Port Trust directed to grant temporary status and consequential benefits including arrears, provident fund, pension, leave, and allowances from 08.08.2005 to 19.04.2012.

The petitioners, four individuals, were initially appointed as ad hoc Junior Engineers (Civil) by the Kandla Port Trust between 1998 and 2000 after fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partly Allows State's Appeal in Daily-Wage Worker's Minimum Wages Case. Daily-Wage Worker Entitled to Minimum Wages and Benefits Under Minimum Wages Act, 1948, But Not Regular Pay Scale or Permanency.

The present Letters Patent Appeal was filed by the State of Gujarat and other officials (appellants) against the order of a learned Single Judge dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Visually Impaired Employee Under Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Termination Based on Pre-Act Medical Report Held Invalid as Employer Failed to Consider Alternative Employment Under Section 47 of the Act.

The petitioner, Ashok Dhondu Ahire, was appointed as a Peon on 28/04/1981 and later worked as a Messenger. By letter dated 22/09/1987, the Board of Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Quashing Recovery of Excess Salary Paid Due to Employer's Mistake. Recovery of Rs.1,94,637/- from Retired Employee Set Aside as Employer's Inadvertence Cannot Be Visited on Employee.

The respondent, Sou. Anjali Anil Tare, was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk (LDC) in 1977 and passed her lower division grade examination in 1980, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Vocational Instructors in Maharashtra. Termination of Shikshan Sevaks (Vocational Instructors) prior to completion of three-year probation period held illegal and violative of principles of natural justice.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by vocational instructors (Shikshan Sevaks) challenging their termination from service by the Shri Shi...