Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Compassionate Appointment in Central Bank of India — Scheme for Incapacitated Employees Must Be Considered. The court directed reconsideration of claim for compassionate appointment under the Sir Sorabji Pochkhanawala Memorial Death Relief Scheme for Employees of Central Bank of India, as the employee was permanently incapacitated.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Nitin s/o Yohan Arawade, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to quash the order dated 25.01.2018 communicated on 31.03.2018, and to direct the respondent, Central Bank of India, to reconsider his claim for compassionate appointment. The petitioner's father, Yohan Paulas Arawade, was employed as a Special Assistant at the Kolegaon Branch, District Ahmednagar, and had served for 34 years and 2 months. He opted for Voluntary Retirement (VRS) on medical grounds after the Permanent Medical Board of the Bank certified him as 'completely and permanently incapacitated' due to Impaired Cognitive Profile. The certificate from the Dean of Sasoon General Hospital, Pune dated 07.04.2015 indicated that the incapacity was not attributable to irregular habits. The respondent Bank had floated a scheme titled 'Sir Sorabji Pochkhanawala Memorial Death Relief Scheme for Employees of Central Bank of India' on 05.08.2014, which was undisputedly in existence. The petitioner contended that his father met with a severe accident in 2014, incurring medical expenses of Rs.10 lac, with the Bank assisting Rs.1.5 lac. There were six dependents including the petitioner and his divorced sister. The court, after hearing both sides, allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order, and directed the respondent to reconsider the petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment in accordance with law and the scheme.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Compassionate Appointment - Permanent Incapacitation - Sir Sorabji Pochkhanawala Memorial Death Relief Scheme for Employees of Central Bank of India - The petitioner sought compassionate appointment after his father voluntarily retired on medical grounds due to permanent incapacitation. The court held that the scheme applies to cases of permanent incapacitation and directed the respondent to reconsider the petitioner's claim in accordance with law and the scheme. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to compassionate appointment under the Sir Sorabji Pochkhanawala Memorial Death Relief Scheme for Employees of Central Bank of India, when his father voluntarily retired on medical grounds due to permanent incapacitation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 25.01.2018 communicated on 31.03.2018 is quashed and set aside. The respondent is directed to reconsider the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment in accordance with law and as per the scheme in existence.

Law Points

  • Compassionate appointment
  • Voluntary retirement on medical grounds
  • Permanent incapacitation
  • Scheme for compassionate appointment
  • Writ of mandamus
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (BOM) (08) 20

Writ Petition No.12352 of 2018

2021-08-04

Ravindra V. Ghuge, S.G. Mehare

Shri Upadhye Vinayak Narayan (for Petitioner), Shri Warad Sunil V. (for Respondent)

Nitin s/o Yohan Arawade

Central Bank of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking compassionate appointment under a scheme for employees of Central Bank of India.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 25.01.2018 communicated on 31.03.2018 and direction to reconsider claim for compassionate appointment.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's father voluntarily retired on medical grounds due to permanent incapacitation, and the petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment was rejected.

Previous Decisions

Order dated 25.01.2018 communicated on 31.03.2018 rejecting the claim.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to compassionate appointment under the Sir Sorabji Pochkhanawala Memorial Death Relief Scheme for Employees of Central Bank of India.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that his father was permanently incapacitated and the scheme applies to such cases. Respondent opposed the petition, but details of arguments not provided in the text.

Ratio Decidendi

The scheme for compassionate appointment applies to cases where an employee is permanently incapacitated and voluntarily retires on medical grounds. The court directed reconsideration of the claim.

Judgment Excerpts

The father of the petitioner, namely, Yohan Paulas Arawade was in employment with the respondent/ Central Bank of India as the Special Assistant at the Kolegaon Branch, District Ahmednagar. He put in 34 years and 02 months in employment when he opted for Voluntary Retirement (VRS) on medical grounds since the Permanent Medical Board of the respondent/ Bank examined him and certified that he was 'completely and permanently incapacitated' to perform any type of services in the respondent/ Bank. The respondent/ Bank floated a scheme titled as 'Sir Sorabji Pochkhanawala Memorial Death Relief Scheme for Employees of Central Bank of India', on 05.08.2014.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.12352 of 2018 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad challenging the order dated 25.01.2018 communicated on 31.03.2018. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 04.08.2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of 100% EOU in Customs Duty Case for Unauthorized DTA Sales of Cut Flowers. Cut Flowers Held Non-Excisable, Duty Leviable on Inputs Under Notification No. 126/94-Cus as Amended, Extended Limitation Period Invoked for Wi...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Students Seeking Declaration of Typing Examination Results. Students of a Recognized Typing Institute Entitled to Results Despite Subsequent Cancellation of Institute's Recognition.