ARBITRATION PETITION NO.549 OF 2013
9 Jun 2017...
Search Results for "Major penalty"
948 result(s) found
Found 948 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lokayukta Observation Note and KSRTC Disciplinary Order Against Employee for Lack of Jurisdiction. Observation Note Issued by Additional Registrar of Enquiries Without Authority Under Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 and KSRTC Disciplinary Proceedings Based Thereon Set Aside.
7 Jul 2025The petitioner, S.S. Bharathi, an employee of Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Const...
- 62
High Court
High Court of Karnataka hears a writ petition challenging the assignment of investigation to the Serious Fraud Investigation Office under Section 212 of the Companies Act, 2013. The petition raises issues regarding the permissibility of parallel investigation and violation of natural justice principles.
16 Feb 2024The petitioner, Exalogic Solutions Private Limited, a one person company incorporated in 2014, sought to quash an order dated 31-01-2024 passed by the...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Head Master's Petition Against Reduction in Rank Without Enquiry. Management's Order of Reduction in Rank Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.
13 Mar 2015The petitioner, Raghunath Bapu Nangare, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher at Bhadole High School on 31 May 1993, effective from 1 June 1993, and h...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Single Judge's Remand Order in Ceiling Surplus Land Cases. Transfers of Land After SLDT Order Held Non-Est, Rule 4 of Maharashtra Agriculture Lands Rules Inapplicable.
13 Jan 2015The appeals arose from a dispute concerning the determination of surplus agricultural land under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdin...
- 121
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds CESTAT's Remand Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute — Evasion of Duty Based on Undervaluation of Plywood/Block Boards. The Court Held That the Adjudicating Authority Must Provide a Reasoned Order After Proper Cross-Examination and Consideration of Evidence, and That the Tribunal's Remand for De Novo Adjudication Was Justified.
19 Aug 2020The case involves appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise against orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) that...
- 279
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Leave Encashment Withheld by Employer After Superannuation. Withholding of leave encashment on ground of pending departmental inquiry is impermissible as leave encashment is a vested right and not a gratuity or pension.
12 Jul 2022The petitioner, Pradip Kumar Roy, was appointed as a Junior Executive Trainee in CMPDI, Ranchi on 01/07/1981 and later transferred to the respondent-C...
- 94
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Election Petition Challenging Election of Returned Candidate from 140-Bagepalli Assembly Constituency on Grounds of Non-disclosure of Assets. Petition Filed Under Sections 80, 81, 100, 101 and 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, Alleges Suppression of Material Information in Nomination Affidavit.
16 Feb 2026The election petition was filed by Sri. C. Muniraju, an unsuccessful candidate of the Bharatiya Janata Party, challenging the election of Sri. S.N. Su...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Impounding of Photocopy of Tenancy Agreement for Collateral Purpose. Photocopy of Unstamped Agreement Cannot Be Impounded Under Section 34 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.
27 Apr 2020The case involves two writ petitions arising from a civil suit for eviction filed by the original plaintiff (Dr. Smt. Seema Arun Mankar) against the o...
- 72
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Send Document for Expert Opinion in Specific Performance Suit. Trial court erred in refusing to send disputed sale agreement to handwriting expert under Section 45 of the Evidence Act, 1872, as the document's genuineness was in serious dispute.
29 Feb 2024The petitioner, Sri Veeranagouda, was the defendant in O.S. No. 334/2015 pending before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Sindhanur, filed by the fi...
- 130
