Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

1852 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1852 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Scope of Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act in International Commercial Disputes. Multiple Issues Framed on Reference to Arbitration in Multi-Party Joint Venture Agreements.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute arose from a series of joint venture and ancillary agreements executed between Indian company Chloro Controls (I) P. Ltd. and foreign coll...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Theft Assessment and Appellate Order — Petitioner Failed to Deposit 50% of Assessed Amount as Required Under Section 127 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003.

18 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Rakhee Gupta, owner of a flat in Mumbai, challenged an order dated 18/01/2016 passed by the Appellate Authority (Superintendent Engine...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Commercial Summary Suit for Non-Compliance with Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate genuine urgency to bypass mandatory pre-institution mediation, as the suit sought recovery of development management fees and security deposit without any specific instances of imminent threat.

11 Nov 2024

The plaintiff, Ekta Housing Private Limited, filed a Commercial Summary Suit against Shraddha Shelters Pvt. Ltd. and two individual guarantors for rec...

Supreme Court

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026

1 Jan 1970

The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...

High Court

High Court Appoints Arbitrator and Grants Interim Relief in Loan Default Case Under Arbitration and SARFAESI Acts. Applicant Secures Protection for Mortgaged Property in Dispute with Respondents

2 Feb 2026

The High Court of Bombay heard two connected applications filed by Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited against Inderjeet Sahni and others. The first ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

29 Apr 2024

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to Arbitrator's Interlocutory Order on Summoning of Documents. Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Interlocutory Orders Under Articles 226 and 227 in Light of SBP & Co. v. Patel Engineering.

16 Mar 2023

The dispute arose between Dodballapur Integrated Textile Park Limited and the claimants, Vinod G. Jain and Premalatha G. Jain, under a sub-lease agree...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Execution Proceedings — Attachment of Amount Deposited in Another Suit Not Permissible Without Proper Procedure Under Order 21 Rule 46 CPC. Decree holder cannot bypass execution procedure by seeking attachment of a sum deposited in a different suit under Section 151 CPC without following Order 21 Rule 46 CPC.

19 Jul 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Sarasamma C., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 21.01.2023 passed ...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against CIRP Admission Due to 45-Day Delay Without Sufficient Cause Under Section 61(2) of IBC. The appeal against admission of corporate debtor into CIRP was dismissed as time-barred, with the court holding that the delay of 45 days beyond the statutory period was not satisfactorily explained.

18 Dec 2024

The judgment pertains to two connected company appeals filed by Kalyan Muppaneni, the suspended director and founder shareholder of M/s. Pi Data Cente...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)