Search Results for "Legal necessity"

3471 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3471 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Remands Suit for Fresh Consideration Due to Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. Failure to Frame Points for Determination by Lower Appellate Court Renders Judgment Unsustainable.

The appellant, Bhagwan Govind Nagre, filed a second appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 06.06.1994 passed by the learned District Judge, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for permanent injunction dismissed as plaintiffs failed to prove possession and title over suit property.

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 2329 OF 2003

The petitioners, K.P. Power Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition in 2003 before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus to compel ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Letters Patent Appeal against decree for possession and mesne profits dismissed as no substantial question of law or perversity found in concurrent findings of fact.

The present Letters Patent Appeal arises from a judgment and decree passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in First Appeal No. 133/1976, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Consolidation of Cooperative Disputes for Joint Trial — Revision Order Upheld. Common questions of law and fact justified consolidation under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Tarkude Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed a dispute (No.254/2006) before the Cooperative Court, Pune, against The Rupee Cooperative Bank Ltd. an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010422252008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Amendment to Section 26 of Bombay Civil Courts Act Prospective, Not Applicable to Pending Appeals. Amendment increasing pecuniary jurisdiction of District Court from Rs.1 lakh to Rs.5 lakh does not apply to appeals already filed before the amendment came into force.

The Bombay High Court considered a reference arising from a learned Single Judge's order dated 4 March 2011, which formulated two questions regarding ...