Search Results for "Labour Inspector"

574 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 574 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony. Victim's Admission of Voluntary Association and Contradictions in Evidence Lead to Benefit of Doubt Under Section 366 IPC and Section 5(1) r/w Section 6 of POCSO Act.

The appellant, Popat Navasu Bendkoli, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO), Nashik, for offences under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder in Illicit Liquor Dispute — Knife Attack Causing Grievous Injuries. Appellants convicted under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC for stabbing victim multiple times; medical evidence and eyewitness testimony corroborated.

The case arises from an incident on 30 August 2011, where the appellants Chandrakant, Nanaji, and Suryakant Shingade attacked Subhash Kanoje with a kn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Discriminatory Designation of Employee as Lineman-cum-Meter Reader Instead of LDC/Meter Reader Violates MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) challenging an order of the Industrial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Jail Sepoy for Concealing Conviction Under Bombay Police Act — Non-Disclosure of Criminal Conviction by Disciplined Force Member Justifies Dismissal in Public Interest

The petitioner, Dnyanshwar Vithuji Ghude, was a jail sepoy (Rakshak) at Central Prison, Amravati, who joined service on 1.11.1964 and was confirmed on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Writ Petition and Allows Trust's Petition in Service Law Dispute Under MEPS Act. Appointment Without Prior Approval Under Section 5 of the MEPS Act is Void, and Termination of Such Employee Does Not Require Compliance with Section 7.

The judgment involves two cross writ petitions arising from a dispute between an employee, Shatrughan Dada Kamble, and the Academy of Fine Arts & Craf...