Search Results for "Joint Hindu family business"

292 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 292 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal, Upholds Specific Performance Decree for Oral Agreement to Sell Land. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With as Plaintiff Proved Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

This second appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement to sell agricultural land. The plaintiff (now represented by legal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance Decree Based on Oral Agreement — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With in Second Appeal. Oral Agreement for Sale of Immovable Property Proved by Evidence; Written Document Dated 31.12.1973 Did Not Supersede Earlier Oral Agreement.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants challenging concurrent judgments and decrees passed for specific performance of an agreement...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Share Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract. MOU for Sale of Shares Held Not Enforceable as Plaintiff Did Not Show Financial Capacity to Pay Balance Consideration Within Stipulated Time.

The appellants, plaintiffs in the suit, filed an appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment of the trial Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement for Sale Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Establish Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract.

The original plaintiff, Vijay Laxmipati Dasari (since deceased, represented by his legal heirs), filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Dismiss Suit Under Order IX Rule 5 CPC. Order IX Rule 5 CPC does not apply when summons were never issued to defendants, and the provision is directory, allowing court discretion to extend time for service.

The petitioner, Sanjay Madanchand Kashyap, who was defendant no.1 in Special Civil Suit No.769 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Bar Council Resolution Prohibiting Full-Time Salaried Law Officers from Practicing as Advocates. The Court Held That the Deletion of Exception Under Rule 49 of the Advocates Act, 1961 Is Valid and Applies to Municipal Law Officers.

The case involves a challenge by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and its Principal Law Officer against resolutions of the Bar Council of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Guardianship Case — Child's Welfare Paramount. Consent of Biological Parents and Child's Best Interests Justify Granting Guardianship to Prospective Adoptive Parents Under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.

The case involves an appeal against an order of a learned single Judge dated 30th November 2004 dismissing the appellants' petition for guardianship. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Temporary Injunction in Property Suit — Appellants Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Alienation of Joint Family Property.

The appellants, Smt. Shubhangi Nandakishor Gaidhani and others, filed an appeal against an order of the trial court refusing to grant a temporary inju...