Search Results for "Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act"

396 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 396 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Food Corporation of India for Non-Compliance of Regularisation Orders — No Willful Disobedience Found as Corporation Took Steps Towards Compliance

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of contempt petitions filed by workmen unions against the Food Corporation of India (FCI) for alleged non-complian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petitions Challenging School Tribunal's Order Quashing Termination of Teacher. Repeated Denovo Enquiries After Earlier Enquiries Are Quashed for Non-Compliance of Rules 36/37 of MEPS Rules, 1981 Are Impermissible.

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed by the Head Master (brother of the President) and the President of the educational institution, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petitions in Teacher Termination Case. Repeated Denovo Enquiries After Quashing for Non-Compliance of MEPS Rules 36 and 37 Are Not Permissible.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Head Master (brother of the President) and the President of an educational institution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim of Retired Employee Despite Pending Regularization and Post-Retirement Chargesheet. Continuous Service of 22 Years Entitles Employee to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Irrespective of Alleged Overage at Joining.

The petitioner, Balvant Mohan Badve, a retired Civil Engineer, joined the Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation on 07/09/1985 and superannuated on 01/04/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Articles of Charges Against KSRTC Employees for Lack of Power to Lay Traps Under Security Standing Orders. The court held that the Security Standing Orders do not authorize the laying of traps, rendering the disciplinary proceedings without jurisdiction.

The petitioners, employees of the Karnataka Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) and Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation (BMTC), challenged the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Gratuity Dispute — Holds That Dismissal for Disorderly Behaviour Under Model Standing Orders 22(a) and 22(l) Constitutes 'Disorderly Conduct' Under Section 4(6)(b)(i) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Disentitling Employee to Gratuity.

The petitioner, Jaya Hind Industries Ltd., employed the respondent, Vilas Vithalrao Takale, as a Clerk. Two charge sheets were issued to the responden...