Search Results for "Finance Act 1978"

406 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 406 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator's Findings of Fact Are Final and Not Re-Examinable Under Section 34.

The petitioners, Dr. Dhiren Lalit Shah and others, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging MPID Act Application in NSEL Scam Case — Held That MPID Act Applies to NSEL as a Financial Establishment and That Default in Repayment of Deposits Attracts Offences Under the Act.

The judgment arises from multiple criminal appeals and interim applications filed by various parties, including directors, brokers, and financial inst...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in BDA Allotment Dispute — Upholds Validity of Sale Deed Despite Non-Registration of Agreement. Single Judge's Order Quashing Allotment Set Aside as Allottee Had Paid Full Consideration and Possession Was Delivered.

The case involves two writ appeals arising from a single judge's order in WP No.11179/2020 dated 21.06.2022. The appellant in WA No.593/2024, Sri Ravi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Non-Delivery of Shares and Limitation Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Law.

The appellant, M/s Satish K. Narang & Co., an investor, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the ju...