RFIRST APPEAL NO. 3732 of 2023
30 Jan 2026The High Court of Gujarat heard two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limite...
Search Results for "Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959"
254 result(s) found
Found 254 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employees' Union's Claim for Priority Over Secured Creditor in Non-Functional Company. The court held that under the SARFAESI Act, the secured creditor's rights prevail over employees' dues when the company is not wound up, but directed sympathetic consideration of employees' claims.
30 Aug 2022The writ petition was filed by Khandelwal Tube Mill Kamgar Sangh, a registered trade union representing employees of Khandelwal Tube Mill (the Company...
- 56
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Reference on Interpretation of Section 9A CPC (Maharashtra Amendment) — Jurisdiction Includes Limitation. The court examines whether the expression 'jurisdiction of the Court to entertain such suit' under Section 9A includes the issue of limitation, doubting the correctness of Foreshore Cooperative Housing Society v. Praveen D. Desai.
4 Oct 2019The Supreme Court considered a reference made by a Division Bench doubting the correctness of the decision in Foreshore Cooperative Housing Society Li...
- 292
High Court
Bombay High Court Declares Assignment of Assets by Ex-Director Void Under Sections 536(2) and 537(1)(b) of Companies Act, 1956 — Post-Winding Up Sale Without Court Leave Invalid. The court held that any disposition of company property after winding up without court approval is void, and subrogation does not permit sale of assets without leave of the court.
21 Oct 2015The judgment concerns two reports filed by the Official Liquidator seeking a declaration that a Deed of Assignment dated 14.03.2012 executed by Mr. Sh...
- 132
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.
9 Oct 2015The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...
- 191
High Court
Bombay High Court Permits Official Liquidator to File Criminal Complaint Under Section 454 of Companies Act, 1956 Against Ex-Directors for Non-Filing of Statement of Affairs. Court Directs Ex-Directors to Deposit Rs. 11,30,743/- as Estimated Cost of Investigation.
1 Aug 2014The Bombay High Court considered an Official Liquidator's Report (OLR No. 5 of 2013) in the winding up of Phoenix Alchemy Pvt. Ltd. The company was or...
- 156
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to Gross Delay and Laches. Petitioner's failure to establish tenancy and inordinate delay in challenging notifications under Land Acquisition Act bars relief.
5 Nov 2012The petitioner, Vinayak Bhaskar Sinai Dhume, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging notifications dated 7th April 1999 a...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case - STP Undertaking Exemption Denied as Manufacturing Commenced Before 1 April 1994. The court held that the conditions of Section 10A(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were not fulfilled because the undertaking had already started manufacturing before the cutoff date, and the subsequent slump sale did not affect the commencement date.
6 Mar 2012The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision allowing the assessee...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Refund of Transfer Fees Paid Under Coercion. Payment of 3% of consideration as transfer fees disguised as repair fund contribution held illegal and recoverable with interest under Section 22 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.
17 Feb 2010The petitioner, Bharatiya Bhavan Cooperative Housing Society Limited, challenged the orders of the First Cooperative Court and the Maharashtra State C...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Intervention in Industrial Dispute. Petitioners Not Necessary Parties Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946.
9 Oct 2006The case involves two writ petitions filed by Empress Mills, a unit of Maharashtra State Textile Corporation Limited, challenging orders passed in B.I...
- 118
