Search Results for "1964 Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "1964 Rules"

1661 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1661 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Legality of Ward Reservation Notification in Municipal Elections. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Notification Reserving Ward No.19 for Scheduled Caste Category Alleging Arbitrariness and Violation of Legal Provisions.

14 Jan 2019

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Municipal Election Dispute — Sets Aside Single Judge Order for Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties. The court held that the writ petition challenging the election of the President of the City Municipal Council was not liable to be dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties as the appellants themselves were members of the council and had participated in the election.

8 Oct 2015

The case pertains to a dispute regarding the election of the President of the City Municipal Council, Basavakalyan. The appellants, Sultan Ali and Smt...

High Court

KAHC010341872013_1

6 Jan 2014

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Gauhati High Court Decision Striking Down Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004 for Repugnancy with Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. Diploma in Medicine and Rural Health Care Held to Be a Medical Qualification Requiring Central Permission Under Section 10A of IMC Act.

10 May 2023

The case involves appeals against the Gauhati High Court's judgment striking down the Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004. The Assam Act...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints for Dishonour of Cheques Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that the complainant must prove that the demand notice was sent to the correct address of the accused by registered post with acknowledgment due, failing which the complaint is not maintainable.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves a batch of criminal writ petitions filed by the petitioners (Prabhakar Dattatraya Gune, Sanjay Chandrakant Kirloskar, and M.V. P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession Based on Title — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds that a co-owner can sue for possession without impleading other co-owners and that adverse possession cannot be claimed against a co-owner.

4 Dec 2018

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and first appellate court in a su...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition by Mayor Challenging No-Confidence Motion Procedure Under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. Court holds that the procedure for no-confidence motion against Mayor is governed by Section 47 of the Act and the Karnataka Municipal Corporations (Election of Mayor, Deputy Mayor and No Confidence Motion) Rules, 1994, and that the motion was validly initiated.

23 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Smt. K.G. Geetha Rudresh, was the Mayor of Tumkur City Corporation. She filed a writ petition challenging the no-confidence motion pas...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Notification Dated 16.08.2008 Imposing Forest Development Tax. Validity of Notification Questioned on Grounds of Legislative Competence and Consistency with Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)