Search Results for "teacher employment"

590 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 590 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Medical College's Appeal Against Reinstatement of Non-Medical Teachers in University Affiliation Dispute. Qualifications of Lecturers with M.Sc. and Ph.D. in Basic Sciences Held Valid Under MCI Regulations for Appointment in Pre-Clinical Departments.

The case involves appeals by K.J. Somaiya Medical College and Research Centre against a common judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 17th April 2007...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employee in School Termination Case. Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981 Renders Termination Illegal.

The petitioners, Lady Yashodabai Joshi Ladies Club (a registered Public Trust) and the Head Master of Golden Kids English High School (collectively re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Institute's Appeal in Gratuity Dispute — Retrospective Amendment Covers Teachers Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Teacher's Claim for Gratuity Upheld as Amended Definition of 'Employee' Includes Teachers with Retrospective Effect from 1997.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with an appeal by Birla Institute of Technology (BIT) against the State of Jharkhand and others, concerning the entit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes School Tribunal Order in Teacher Termination Case — Failure to Frame Preliminary Issues as Mandated by Division Bench. Appointment Validity Under Section 5 of MEPS Act Not Properly Examined.

The petitioners, Bhartiya Shikshan Sanstha and its Headmistress, challenged an order of the School Tribunal, Aurangabad, which allowed the appeal of r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Teacher's Claim for Salary for Period Prior to Interim Order in Service Dispute. Petitioner's claim for salary from 1.1.1997 to 9.2.1998 rejected as no interim order covered that period and no entitlement established.

The petitioner, Kum. Smita Appasaheb Indulkar (now Mrs. Smita Madukar Tewalekar), filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a directi...