Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employee in School Termination Case. Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981 Renders Termination Illegal.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Lady Yashodabai Joshi Ladies Club (a registered Public Trust) and the Head Master of Golden Kids English High School (collectively referred to as 'the management'), challenged the judgment and order dated 01-04-2022 passed by the Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Amravati in Appeal No. 14/2020. The Tribunal had partly allowed the appeal filed by respondent No. 1, Smt. Mrudula Govindrao Kavishwar (the employee), setting aside the notice of termination dated 16-04-2019, deeming the employee to be in continuous service from 16-07-2019, directing the management to pay full back-wages from 16-07-2019 till the date of judgment, and directing the management to follow the procedure under Rule 27(d) and (e) read with Rule 25A of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981. The management assailed this order before the High Court. The High Court, after hearing the parties, dismissed the writ petition, upholding the Tribunal's order. The court held that the termination was illegal as the management failed to comply with the mandatory procedure prescribed under the Rules. The court directed the management to comply with the directions within a specified period. The judgment was pronounced on 12-08-2022.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Termination of School Employee - Mandatory Procedure - Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981, Rules 27(d), 27(e), 25A - The management terminated the employee without following the mandatory procedure of holding an inquiry as per Rules 27(d) and (e) read with Rule 25A. The School Tribunal set aside the termination and directed reinstatement with full back-wages. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's order, holding that non-compliance with the mandatory procedure renders the termination illegal and void. (Paras 4-6)

B) Service Law - Back-Wages - Reinstatement - Full back-wages from date of termination till date of judgment - The Tribunal directed payment of full back-wages from 16-7-2019 till the date of judgment, and the High Court affirmed this direction, noting that the employee was deemed to be in continuous service. (Para 4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of the employee by the school management was valid and in compliance with the mandatory procedure under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the School Tribunal's order dated 01-04-2022. The management was directed to comply with the directions within the specified period.

Law Points

  • Termination of a school employee without following the mandatory procedure under Rule 27(d) and (e) read with Rule 25A of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules
  • 1981 is illegal and void
  • entitling the employee to reinstatement with full back-wages and continuity of service.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (08) 142

WRIT PETITION NO. 2353 OF 2022

2022-08-12

ROHIT B. DEO, J.

Mr. J.T. Gilda, Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. A.J. Gilda for petitioners; Mr. V.A. Kothale for respondent 1; Mr. S.M. Ukey, Addl.G.P. for respondent 2

Lady Yashodabai Joshi Ladies Club and The Head Master, Golden Kids English High School

Smt. Mrudula Govindrao Kavishwar and The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Amravati

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the order of the School Tribunal which set aside termination of an employee and directed reinstatement with back-wages.

Remedy Sought

The management sought to quash the Tribunal's order and uphold the termination.

Filing Reason

The management was aggrieved by the Tribunal's order setting aside the termination and directing reinstatement with full back-wages.

Previous Decisions

The School Tribunal, Amravati in Appeal No. 14/2020 partly allowed the employee's appeal, set aside termination notice dated 16-04-2019, deemed continuous service from 16-07-2019, directed payment of full back-wages from 16-07-2019 till judgment date, and directed compliance with Rules 27(d) and (e) read with Rule 25A.

Issues

Whether the termination of the employee was in compliance with the mandatory procedure under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners (management) argued that the termination was valid and the Tribunal erred in setting it aside. Respondent 1 (employee) supported the Tribunal's order.

Ratio Decidendi

Termination of a school employee without following the mandatory procedure under Rule 27(d) and (e) read with Rule 25A of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981 is illegal and void, and the employee is entitled to reinstatement with full back-wages and continuity of service.

Judgment Excerpts

The management is assailing the judgment and order dated 01-4-2022 rendered by the Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Amravati (Tribunal) in Appeal 14/2020, whereby the appeal preferred by respondent 1 (employee) is partly allowed, the notice of termination dated 16-4-2019 is set aside... the management is directed to follow the procedure contemplated in Rule 27(d) and (e) read with Rule 25A of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of service) Regulation Rules, 1981...

Procedural History

The employee filed Appeal No. 14/2020 before the School Tribunal, Amravati challenging the termination notice dated 16-04-2019. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal on 01-04-2022. The management filed Writ Petition No. 2353 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, which was dismissed on 12-08-2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981: Rule 27(d), Rule 27(e), Rule 25A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employee in School Termination Case. Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedure under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Rules, 1981 ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 323, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Unlawful Assembly a...