Search Results for "taxable income"

531 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 531 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Provision for Unascertained Liabilities is Invalid.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016, declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid Under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 as Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) Was Full and True Disclosure.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016 declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Issued to Dead Person Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Notice and Reassessment Order Void Ab Initio. Legal Heir's Participation Under Protest Does Not Cure Jurisdictional Defect.

The petitioner, Shri Devendra S/o Vasudeo Jambhulkar, is the son and legal heir of late Vasudeo Damduji Jambhulkar, who was an income tax assessee wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment After Four Years Invalid as Assessee Had Made Full Disclosure During Original Assessment Under Section 143(3).

The petitioner, Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd., challenged a notice dated 28 March 2019 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by ITAT. Tribunal's order set aside for failing to consider the TPO's detailed analysis and rejecting comparables without proper reasoning under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal was filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 6 under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Penalty Deletion Upheld for Bonafide Claims. Claims for deduction under Section 35D and diminution in value of shares were bonafide and not concealment, following CIT vs. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment for UK Insurance Company in Income Tax Case — Lack of Fresh Material and Change of Opinion. Reopening under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 based on mere change of opinion without new tangible material is invalid.

The petitioner, The Prudential Assurance Company Ltd., a UK-incorporated insurance company registered as a sub-account of a Foreign Institutional Inve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessees in Income Tax Reference Regarding Gold Bonds Profit as Capital Gain. Profit from sale of National Defence Gold Bonds held not taxable as business income under Income Tax Act, 1961, as transaction was not an adventure in the nature of trade.

The case involves three income tax references arising from a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, for the assessment year 1980-8...